Literature DB >> 14990207

Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Amina Khan1, Lisa A Newman.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive form of breast cancer that has increased in incidence over the past 25 years, primarily as a result of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Inadequately treated DCIS carries a risk for evolving into the malignant phenotype; however, the magnitude and timeline for this risk are poorly defined. Treatment options include lumpectomy with or without breast irradiation and mastectomy. The overall survival rate is 96% to 98% with any of these strategies, but the risk of local recurrence (LR) is highest after lumpectomy alone. Breast irradiation can reduce this risk from levels in excess of 40% to 10% over a 10-year follow-up period. Approximately 50% of all LR from DCIS are invasive lesions. Therefore, the occurrence of a LR after breast-conserving therapy is a potentially greater threat to the patient with DCIS compared to the patient diagnosed with invasive cancer. In patients diagnosed with invasive cancer, the risk of micrometastatic disease is present from the time of initial diagnosis. In patients with DCIS, the expectation is that a potentially 100% cure rate should be achieved with local therapy alone. Although most DCIS cases complicated by LR will be successfully salvaged with prolonged overall survival, it is critically important to take every precaution that will minimize the risk of locally recurrent disease. Therefore, radiation therapy as an adjunct to lumpectomy is essential. A subset of patients with DCIS with low-volume low-grade disease who can be safely treated by lumpectomy alone has not yet been clearly defined. Prospective studies designed to identify this category are ongoing. Inadequate margin control is the most consistent risk factor for LR that has been reported thus far, but there is no universally accepted definition for what constitutes an optimal negative margin distance. Young age at diagnosis, high nuclear grade, and comedonecrosis are other factors that have been implicated as increasing the risk for LR. Tamoxifen can further decrease the rate of new in-breast events on the affected side and in the contralateral breast. Ongoing trials will also define the role of aromatase inhibitors as a risk-reducing strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14990207     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-004-0045-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  41 in total

Review 1.  Consensus Conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situ. The Consensus Conference Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853.

Authors:  N Bijker; J L Peterse; L Duchateau; J P Julien; I S Fentiman; C Duval; S Di Palma; J Simony-Lafontaine; I de Mascarel; M J van de Vijver
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery with or without radiation therapy: patterns of failure and 10-year results.

Authors:  L L Kestin; N S Goldstein; A A Martinez; M Rebner; M Balasubramaniam; R C Frazier; J T Register; J Pettinga; F A Vicini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Cell biological factors in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast-relationship to ipsilateral local recurrence and histopathological characteristics.

Authors:  A Ringberg; L Anagnostaki; H Anderson; I Idvall; M Fernö
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Giovanni Mazzarol; Viviana Galimberti; Alberto Luini; Virgilio Sacchini; Giuseppe Trifirò; Oreste Gentilini; Giancarlo Pruneri; Paola Naninato; Fabio Torres; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03

6.  Duct carcinoma in situ. Relationship of extent of noninvasive disease to the frequency of occult invasion, multicentricity, lymph node metastases, and short-term treatment failures.

Authors:  M D Lagios; P R Westdahl; F R Margolin; M R Rose
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Precancerous and cancerous breast lesions during lifetime and at autopsy. A study of 83 women.

Authors:  M Nielsen; J Jensen; J Andersen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Current surgical management of in situ cancer of the female breast.

Authors:  S Albert; S Belle; D Eckert; G M Swanson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont; L W Rogers; M Landenberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast cancer and atypia among young and middle-aged women: a study of 110 medicolegal autopsies.

Authors:  M Nielsen; J L Thomsen; S Primdahl; U Dyreborg; J A Andersen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patterns and correlates of local therapy for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Barbara Salem; Indu Lakhani; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Carbohydrate antigens in nipple aspirate fluid predict the presence of atypia and cancer in women requiring diagnostic breast biopsy.

Authors:  Susan L Deutscher; Marie Dickerson; Gerald Gui; Jessica Newton; Jeffrey E Holm; Nancy Vogeltanz-Holm; Beth Kliethermes; John E Hewett; Senthil R Kumar; Thomas P Quinn; Edward R Sauter
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Risk of subsequent invasive breast carcinoma after in situ breast carcinoma in a population covered by national mammographic screening.

Authors:  R Rawal; J Lorenzo Bermejo; K Hemminki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.