Literature DB >> 14989686

Social interaction patterns of children and adolescents with and without oral clefts during a videotaped analogue social encounter.

Keith J Slifer1, Adrianna Amari, Tanya Diver, Lisa Hilley, Melissa Beck, Alana Kane, Sharon McDonnell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the social interaction patterns of children with and without oral clefts.
DESIGN: Participants were videotaped while interacting with a peer confederate. Oral cleft and control groups were compared on social behavior and several self- and parent-report measures. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four 8- to 15-year-olds with oral clefts, matched for sex, age, and socioeconomic status with 34 noncleft controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were obtained on social behaviors coded from videotapes and on child and parent ratings of social acceptance/competence and facial appearance.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between groups: children with clefts made fewer choices and more often failed to respond to peer questions; children with clefts and their parents reported greater dissatisfaction with the child's facial appearance; and parents of children with clefts rated them as less socially competent. Significant within-group associations were also found. Parent perception of child social competence and child self-perception of social acceptance were positively correlated for both groups. Children with clefts who felt more socially accepted more often looked a peer in the face. Controls who felt more socially accepted chose an activity less often during the social encounter.
CONCLUSIONS: Differing patterns of overt social behavior as well as parent and self-perception can be measured between children with and without oral clefts. Such results may be helpful in developing interventions to enhance social skills and parent/child adjustment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14989686     DOI: 10.1597/02-084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  4 in total

Review 1.  Neuropsychological, behavioral, and academic sequelae of cleft: early developmental, school age, and adolescent/young adult outcomes.

Authors:  Lynn C Richman; Thomasin E McCoy; Amy L Conrad; Peg C Nopoulos
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-09-09

2.  Social motivation in individuals with isolated cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Ellen van der Plas; Timothy R Koscik; Amy L Conrad; David J Moser; Peg Nopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Scores of the Cleft Hearing, Appearance and Speech Questionnaire (CHASQ) in Swedish Participants With Cleft lip and/or Cleft Palate and a Control Population.

Authors:  Mia Stiernman; Kristina Klintö; Martin Persson; Magnus Becker
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-09-04

4.  Do cleft lip and palate patients opt for secondary corrective surgery of upper lip and nose, frequently?

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Elefterios Vairaktaris; Christian Knipfer
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.151

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.