Literature DB >> 14989404

The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

Barbara A Cornblatt1, Todd Lencz, Christopher W Smith, Christoph U Correll, Andrea M Auther, Emilie Nakayama.   

Abstract

Despite the widespread acceptance of the neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia, its application to research concerned with the prodromal phase of illness is limited. Little recognition has been given to the concept of an enduring biological vulnerability to illness that may be responsive to early intervention. Rather, the focus of most prodromal studies is on emerging positive symptoms. The Recognition and Prevention (RAP) program follows the strategy of being equally concerned with the nonspecific symptoms reflecting the core of schizophrenia and those directly related to psychosis. Data were collected from 62 adolescents (mean age = 16.4 years) during the initial 3-year pilot phase of the RAP program (1998-2001). Subjects were divided into three clinical high-risk groups, characterized by (1) negative and nonspecific symptoms (e.g., social isolation, school failures), the earliest prodrome stage; (2) emerging attenuated positive symptoms of moderate intensity; and (3) severe attenuated (but subpsychotic) positive symptoms, considered most proximal to psychosis. Four risk factors, derived from the neurodevelopmental literature, were selected to reflect the vulnerability core: cognitive deficits, affective disturbances, social isolation, and school failure. All four domains were equally impaired across the three risk groups, supporting the presence of the underlying vulnerability core regardless of the magnitude of emerging positive symptoms. An observational pilot study was also conducted to identify the medications typically used to treat emerging positive symptoms. Antidepressants were used as frequently as antipsychotics to treat adolescents presenting with moderate attenuated positive symptoms. Regardless of type of medication, moderately symptomatic youngsters did quite well over the approximately 1-year followup period. By contrast, adolescents presenting with more severe (but nonpsychotic) attenuated symptoms were treated with antipsychotics, often in combination with other agents. Outcome for the more symptomatic youngsters was, however, more guarded, with nearly half (i.e., 47%) of the group converting to a schizophrenia spectrum psychotic disorder. Nonadherence to medication appeared to be a major risk factor in this group. We conclude that a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia is supported by our data and that a range of novel treatment strategies may be neuroprotective by directly affecting the disorder's vulnerability core.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14989404     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  114 in total

1.  Abnormal movements are associated with poor psychosocial functioning in adolescents at high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Vijay A Mittal; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Melita Daley; Cristina Roman; Carrie E Bearden; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Neuropsychology of the prodrome to psychosis in the NAPLS consortium: relationship to family history and conversion to psychosis.

Authors:  Larry J Seidman; Anthony J Giuliano; Eric C Meyer; Jean Addington; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Carrie E Bearden; Bruce K Christensen; Keith Hawkins; Robert Heaton; Richard S E Keefe; Robert Heinssen; Barbara A Cornblatt
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06

3.  Risk factors for psychosis: impaired social and role functioning.

Authors:  Barbara A Cornblatt; Ricardo E Carrión; Jean Addington; Larry Seidman; Elaine F Walker; Tyronne D Cannon; Kristin S Cadenhead; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Scott W Woods; Robert Heinssen; Todd Lencz
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Prediction of conversion to psychosis: review and future directions.

Authors:  Dylan G Gee; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.697

Review 5.  Risk and protection in prodromal schizophrenia: ethical implications for clinical practice and future research.

Authors:  Nasra Haroun; Laura Dunn; Ansar Haroun; Kristin S Cadenhead
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 6.  Assessment of adolescents at risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Karin Borgmann-Winter; Monica E Calkins; Kathryn Kniele; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  MATRICS cognitive consensus battery (MCCB) performance in children, adolescents, and young adults.

Authors:  George C Nitzburg; Pamela Derosse; Katherine E Burdick; Bart D Peters; Chaya B Gopin; Anil K Malhotra
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Comorbid depressive symptoms in the developmental course of adolescent-onset psychosis.

Authors:  Marina Myles-Worsley; Starla Weaver; Francisca Blailes
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.732

9.  Differentiation in the preonset phases of schizophrenia and mood disorders: evidence in support of a bipolar mania prodrome.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Julie B Penzner; Anne M Frederickson; Jessica J Richter; Andrea M Auther; Christopher W Smith; John M Kane; Barbara A Cornblatt
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 10.  Pediatric bipolar disorder: evidence for prodromal states and early markers.

Authors:  Joan L Luby; Neha Navsaria
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.