Literature DB >> 14988804

Group hibernation does not reduce energetic costs of young yellow-bellied marmots.

Kenneth B Armitage1, Brett C Woods.   

Abstract

We investigated mechanisms of energy conservation during hibernation. The amount of time torpid was significantly less for groups of three young marmots than for marmots hibernating singly. Mean daily mass loss (DML; as mg d(-1) g(-1) immergence mass) averaged 1.33 for single marmots and 1.46 for grouped young. Animals were active 17.3% of the time, which used 82.4% of the energy, and were torpid 82.7% of the time, which used 17.6% of the energy expenditure. During longer torpor bouts, more time was spent in deep torpor, which decreased the hourly cost of a complete bout. Bout oxygen consumption V dot o2, percent time in deep torpor, and body temperature (T(B)) during deep torpor changed seasonally and were curvilinearly related to when in the hibernation period the measurements were made and probably represent a stage in the circannual metabolic cycle. The decrease of environmental temperature (T(E)) to 2 degrees C significantly increased metabolism. Potential costs of low T(E) were reduced by allowing T(B) to decrease, thereby reducing the T(B) to T(E) gradient. Average monthly metabolic rate was high early and late in the hibernation period when time spent euthermic was greater and when VO2 was higher. Over the hibernation period, energy saved averaged 77.1% and 88.0% of the costs for winter and summer euthermic metabolism, respectively. Hibernation costs were reduced by the seasonal changes, the high percentage of time in torpor, the rapid decline in V dot o2 following arousal, and allowing T(B) to decline at lower T(E). Asynchrony in the torpor cycles increased energy expenditures in group hibernators, which negated possible beneficial effects of group hibernation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14988804     DOI: 10.1086/378137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  2 in total

1.  Winter weather versus group thermoregulation: what determines survival in hibernating mammals?

Authors:  V P Patil; S F Morrison; T J Karels; D S Hik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  iMarmot: an integrative platform for comparative and functional genomics of marmots.

Authors:  Baoning Liu; Liang Bai; Qingqing Yu; Fang Hu; Jing Wu; Sihai Zhao; Rong Wang; Weirong Wang; Yuanqing Tao; Jianglin Fan; Enqi Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.