Literature DB >> 14988134

An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms.

P M Taylor1, J Champness, R M Given-Wilson, H W W Potts, K Johnston.   

Abstract

The NHS Breast Screening Programme is changing working practices in response to increased workload and manpower shortages. Radiographers are being trained as film readers. Computer aids are being considered. We have evaluated the impact of prompts placed by the R2 ImageChecker 1000 on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers, including non-radiologist film readers. 30 radiologists, 5 breast clinicians and 15 radiographers each read 180 films, including 60 cancers (20 false negative interval cases and 40 screen detected cancers). Each reader read each case twice, once with and once without computer prompts. The order in which the reading sessions were carried out was randomized separately for each reader. 36 out of 40 screen-detected cases were prompted by the ImageChecker, a sensitivity of 90%. Eight out of 20 interval cases were prompted, a sensitivity of 40%. No significant difference was found for readers' sensitivity or specificity between the prompted and unprompted conditions. No significant difference was found between the sensitivity and specificity of the different groups of film reader. No difference in impact of prompts was found for well or poorly performing film readers. The result suggests that this version of the ImageChecker would not have a significant impact on the UK screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14988134     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/34203805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  4 in total

1.  Automatic Detection of Masses in Mammograms Using Quality Threshold Clustering, Correlogram Function, and SVM.

Authors:  Joberth de Nazaré Silva; Antonio Oseas de Carvalho Filho; Aristófanes Corrêa Silva; Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva; Marcelo Gattass
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The kaiser permanente interregional breast care leaders.

Authors:  Douglas Shearer; Mark Littlewood
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2005

3.  Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.

Authors:  Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Robert A Smith; María de la Luz Carranza-Flores; Andy Bogart; Louis Martínez-Matsushita; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Carolina Ortega-Olvera; Ernesto Montemayor-Varela; Angélica Angeles-Llerenas; Sergio Bautista-Arredondo; Gilberto Sánchez-González; Olga G Martínez-Montañez; Santos R Uscanga-Sánchez; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Caroline Rm Boggis; Magnus A McGee; Pamela M Griffiths; Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Maureen Gc Gillan; Mary Wilson; Anil K Jain; Nicola Barr; Ursula M Beetles; Miriam A Griffiths; Jill Johnson; Rita M Roberts; Heather E Deans; Karen A Duncan; Geeta Iyengar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.