Literature DB >> 14987592

Investigating 3He diffusion NMR in the lungs using finite difference simulations and in vivo PGSE experiments.

Stanislao Fichele1, Martyn N J Paley, Neil Woodhouse, Paul D Griffiths, Edwin J R van Beek, Jim M Wild.   

Abstract

Finite difference simulations have been used to model (3)He gas diffusion in simulated lung tissue. The technique has the advantage that a wide range of structural models and diffusion-sensitizing gradient waveforms can be investigated, for which analytical methods would otherwise be virtually impossible. Results from simulations and in vivo pulsed-gradient-spin-echo (PGSE) experiments show that the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a function of diffusion time and gradient strength, and suggests diffusion is locally anisotropic. The simulations have been compared to recent work on an analytical model that characterizes lung tissue as a series of independent cylinders. The results presented may have clinical implications for (3)He ADC measurements in assessing lung diseases such as chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14987592     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2003.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  10 in total

1.  In vivo lung morphometry with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI: theoretical background.

Authors:  A L Sukstanskii; D A Yablonskiy
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Helium-3 diffusion MR imaging of the human lung over multiple time scales.

Authors:  John P Mugler; Chengbo Wang; G Wilson Miller; Gordon D Cates; Jaime F Mata; James R Brookeman; Eduard E de Lange; Talissa A Altes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Random walk simulation of the MRI apparent diffusion coefficient in a geometrical model of the acinar tree.

Authors:  José M Pérez-Sánchez; Ignacio Rodríguez; Jesús Ruiz-Cabello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  In vivo lung morphometry with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI in canines with induced emphysema: disease progression and comparison with computed tomography.

Authors:  Tariq S K Tanoli; Jason C Woods; Mark S Conradi; Kyongtae Ty Bae; David S Gierada; James C Hogg; Joel D Cooper; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-07-27

5.  Quantification of lung microstructure with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii; Jason C Woods; David S Gierada; James D Quirk; James C Hogg; Joel D Cooper; Mark S Conradi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-08-06

6.  Precise Inference and Characterization of Structural Organization (PICASO) of tissue from molecular diffusion.

Authors:  Lipeng Ning; Evren Özarslan; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Yogesh Rathi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Diffusion lung imaging with hyperpolarized gas MRI.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii; James D Quirk
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  3D diffusion-weighted 129 Xe MRI for whole lung morphometry.

Authors:  Ho-Fung Chan; Neil J Stewart; Graham Norquay; Guilhem J Collier; Jim M Wild
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Comparison of 3 He and 129 Xe MRI for evaluation of lung microstructure and ventilation at 1.5T.

Authors:  Neil J Stewart; Ho-Fung Chan; Paul J C Hughes; Felix C Horn; Graham Norquay; Madhwesha Rao; Denise P Yates; Rob H Ireland; Matthew Q Hatton; Bilal A Tahir; Paul Ford; Andrew J Swift; Rod Lawson; Helen Marshall; Guilhem J Collier; Jim M Wild
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  In vivo methods and applications of xenon-129 magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Helen Marshall; Neil J Stewart; Ho-Fung Chan; Madhwesha Rao; Graham Norquay; Jim M Wild
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 9.795

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.