OBJECTIVES: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a strong diagnostic predictor of left-ventricular (LV)-dysfunction. Recently, the aminoterminal portion of pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) has been introduced, which could be even more sensitive because of its longer half-life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the new marker NT-proBNP within a large, heterogeneous population of patients with suspected cardiovascular disease at risk of cardiovascular dysfunction and to compare it with the established diagnostic parameter BNP. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: NT-proBNP and BNP were measured in 339 hospitalised patients undergoing diagnostic angiography (median age 66 years, 244 male vs. 95 female). RESULTS: Median values of NT-proBNP increased with worsening LV-dysfunction and higher NYHA class. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of NT-proBNP for detecting severe systolic dysfunction or for detecting any systolic LV-dysfunction was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. The latter improved (AUC=0.81) when patients with clinically relevant heart disease like valvular dysfunction were included, independent of the haemodynamic values. Compared to BNP, NT-proBNP tended to be more accurate in identifying lesser degrees of LV-dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Even after optimisation of target criteria, there was still a substantial overlap of NT-proBNP values between patients with and without relevant heart disease. Therefore, NT-proBNP is not suitable as a screening test for LV-dysfunction in the community. Nevertheless, because of its good negative predictive value, NT-proBNP could be an easy and effective tool to rule out severe systolic LV-dysfunction in high risk patients. No clinically significant advantage of BNP testing could be found.
OBJECTIVES:B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a strong diagnostic predictor of left-ventricular (LV)-dysfunction. Recently, the aminoterminal portion of pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) has been introduced, which could be even more sensitive because of its longer half-life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the new marker NT-proBNP within a large, heterogeneous population of patients with suspected cardiovascular disease at risk of cardiovascular dysfunction and to compare it with the established diagnostic parameter BNP. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: NT-proBNP and BNP were measured in 339 hospitalised patients undergoing diagnostic angiography (median age 66 years, 244 male vs. 95 female). RESULTS: Median values of NT-proBNP increased with worsening LV-dysfunction and higher NYHA class. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of NT-proBNP for detecting severe systolic dysfunction or for detecting any systolic LV-dysfunction was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. The latter improved (AUC=0.81) when patients with clinically relevant heart disease like valvular dysfunction were included, independent of the haemodynamic values. Compared to BNP, NT-proBNP tended to be more accurate in identifying lesser degrees of LV-dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Even after optimisation of target criteria, there was still a substantial overlap of NT-proBNP values between patients with and without relevant heart disease. Therefore, NT-proBNP is not suitable as a screening test for LV-dysfunction in the community. Nevertheless, because of its good negative predictive value, NT-proBNP could be an easy and effective tool to rule out severe systolic LV-dysfunction in high risk patients. No clinically significant advantage of BNP testing could be found.
Authors: Lisa C Costello-Boerrigter; Guido Boerrigter; Margaret M Redfield; Richard J Rodeheffer; Lynn H Urban; Douglas W Mahoney; Steven J Jacobsen; Denise M Heublein; John C Burnett Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Roman Pfister; Thorsten Wahlers; Frank M Baer; Max Scherner; Justus Strauch; Erland Erdmann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: K Kurz; R Voelker; D Zdunek; R Wergeland; G Hess; B Ivandic; H Katus; E Giannitsis Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Meyeon Park; Eric Vittinghoff; Michael G Shlipak; Rakesh Mishra; Mary Whooley; Nisha Bansal Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Mohit K Turagam; Mahek Mirza; Paul H Werner; Jasbir Sra; David C Kress; A Jamil Tajik; Arshad Jahangir Journal: Cardiol Rev Date: 2016 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.644