Literature DB >> 14987188

Do within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion predict between-session changes in patients with low back pain?

Andrew J Hahne, Jennifer L Keating, Simon C Wilson.   

Abstract

Physiotherapists commonly use post-treatment changes in a patient's pain intensity and range of motion to guide treatment selection and predict possible longer-term outcomes. This study tested the validity of this practice by evaluating the predictive value of within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion in 53 patients with low back pain. Pain intensity and range of motion measurements of spinal flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and straight-leg-raise were taken by the patient's therapist before and after one treatment session, and were repeated by a blinded therapist at the beginning of the patient's subsequent treatment session. Regression analysis revealed that the strength of association between within-session and between-session changes ranged from r = 0.35 to r = 0.80 for range of motion measurements, and from r = 0.24 to r = 0.47 for pain intensity. Odds ratios for pain and range of motion ranged from 3.5 (95% CI 0.9 to 14.6) to 37.0 (95% CI 4.1 to 330), indicating greater odds of improving between-session if improvement was obtained within-session. These results provide preliminary support for the practice of using within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion to guide treatment selection when treating impairments in patients with low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14987188     DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60244-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Physiother        ISSN: 0004-9514


  13 in total

1.  The ability of a sustained within-session finding of pain reduction during traction to dictate improved outcomes from a manual therapy approach on patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Alexis A Wright; J Haxby Abbott; Dave Baxter; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-09

2.  Is there preliminary value to a within- and/or between-session change for determining short-term outcomes of manual therapy on mechanical neck pain?

Authors:  Chad Cook; Jessica Lawrence; Katelyn Michalak; Sidra Dhiraprasiddhi; Megan Donaldson; Shannon Petersen; Kenneth Learman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-11

3.  How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation?

Authors:  Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

4.  In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

5.  Metastatic cancer mimicking mechanical low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Lance M Mabry; Michael D Ross; John M Tonarelli
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

6.  No Differences in Outcomes in People with Low Back Pain Who Met the Clinical Prediction Rule for Lumbar Spine Manipulation When a Pragmatic Non-thrust Manipulation Was Used as the Comparator.

Authors:  Kenneth Learman; Christopher Showalter; Bryan O'Halloran; Megan Donaldson; Chad Cook
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

8.  Spinal manipulative therapy-specific changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with low back pain (NCT01168999).

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Steven Z George; Maggie E Horn; Donald D Price; Roland Staud; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  A randomized clinical trial to compare the immediate effects of seated thoracic manipulation and targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine flexion range of motion and pain.

Authors:  Steve Karas; Megan J Olson Hunt
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-05

10.  Specific treatment of problems of the spine (STOPS): design of a randomised controlled trial comparing specific physiotherapy versus advice for people with subacute low back disorders.

Authors:  Andrew J Hahne; Jon J Ford; Luke D Surkitt; Matthew C Richards; Alexander Y P Chan; Sarah L Thompson; Rana S Hinman; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.