Literature DB >> 14987148

How sensitive is a prostate-specific antigen measurement? How sensitive does it need to be?

Jay L Bock1, George G Klee.   

Abstract

Assays are now available that can measure very low concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), but their analytic performance and clinical utility are not well defined. This brief article highlights some of the clinical issues related to the limited prognostic significance of small changes in PSA concentrations in men with prostate cancer who have been treated with prostate ablation therapy. College of American Pathologists proficiency survey data are presented, illustrating the performance of commercial PSA assays with low PSA concentration survey samples tested between 1998 and 2002. The performance of the assays appears to be improving, but many of the currently used assays have intralaboratory coefficients of variation greater than 20% for PSA concentrations less than 0.4 ng/mL. Also, there are major differences in the level of PSA reported by various assays in these low concentration samples. These level differences (if they are also seen in clinical samples) may cause clinical problems when fixed serum PSA thresholds (eg, 0.2 ng/mL) are used to make clinical decisions related to prostate tumor recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14987148     DOI: 10.5858/2004-128-341-HSIAPA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  6 in total

1.  Major inter-laboratory variations in PSA testing practices: results from national surveys in Ireland in 2006 and 2007.

Authors:  F J Drummond; L Sharp; H Comber
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Fifth-generation digital immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen by single molecule array technology.

Authors:  David H Wilson; David W Hanlon; Gail K Provuncher; Lei Chang; Linan Song; Purvish P Patel; Evan P Ferrell; Herbert Lepor; Alan W Partin; Dan W Chan; Lori J Sokoll; Carol D Cheli; Robert P Thiel; David R Fournier; David C Duffy
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

4.  Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay redefines "undetectable" PSA and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C Shad Thaxton; Robert Elghanian; Audrey D Thomas; Savka I Stoeva; Jae-Seung Lee; Norm D Smith; Anthony J Schaeffer; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Georg Bartsch; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations.

Authors:  David M Rissin; Cheuk W Kan; Todd G Campbell; Stuart C Howes; David R Fournier; Linan Song; Tomasz Piech; Purvish P Patel; Lei Chang; Andrew J Rivnak; Evan P Ferrell; Jeffrey D Randall; Gail K Provuncher; David R Walt; David C Duffy
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  A Joint Model for the Kinetics of CTC Count and PSA Concentration During Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  M Wilbaux; M Tod; J De Bono; D Lorente; J Mateo; G Freyer; B You; E Hénin
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.