Literature DB >> 14986308

Distribution of anterogradely labeled trigeminal and auditory nerve boutons on abducens motor neurons in turtles: implications for in vitro classical conditioning.

Joyce Keifer1, Maxim Mokin.   

Abstract

A conditioned abducens nerve response is generated in in vitro brainstem preparations from turtles by pairing a weak conditioned stimulus (CS) applied to the auditory nerve that immediately precedes an unconditioned stimulus (US) applied to the trigeminal nerve. Tract-tracing studies showed direct projections from auditory and trigeminal nerves to abducens motor neurons. In light of these findings for convergent CS-US inputs, it is hypothesized that auditory and trigeminal nerve synaptic inputs onto abducens motor neurons are in spatial proximity because the CS is a weak input that may be required to be near the US inputs to have an associative effect, and conditioning occurs only when the CS and US are temporally separated by less than 100 ms. This study examined the spatial relationship of 133 anterogradely labeled synaptic boutons conveying CS or US information on retrogradely labeled abducens motor neurons. The results show that trigeminal and auditory nerve terminal fields occupy primarily the soma and proximal dendrites of abducens motor neurons. Quantitative analysis shows that the majority of labeled boutons (76% and 85% from injections of the trigeminal and auditory nerves, respectively) were apposed to somata or were localized to dendritic segments no more than about 30 microm from the nucleus. There were no quantitative differences between trigeminal and auditory nerve boutons in terms of their localization on dendrites or bouton diameter. Finally, triple labeling experiments demonstrated that individual abducens motor neurons receive inputs from both nerves and that these inputs may be in close spatial proximity to one another. This synaptic arrangement allows for the possibility that in vitro abducens conditioning is generated by coincident CS-US detection mediated by NMDA receptors and may utilize a Hebbian-like plasticity mechanism. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14986308     DOI: 10.1002/cne.20032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  6 in total

1.  Coordinate action of pre- and postsynaptic brain-derived neurotrophic factor is required for AMPAR trafficking and acquisition of in vitro classical conditioning.

Authors:  W Li; J Keifer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Subunit-specific synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors by auxiliary chaperone proteins TARPγ8 and GSG1L in classical conditioning.

Authors:  Joyce Keifer; Neeraj K Tiwari; Leah Buse; Zhaoqing Zheng
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Rapid enrichment of presynaptic protein in boutons undergoing classical conditioning is mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

Authors:  W Li; J Keifer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Expression of the immediate-early gene-encoded protein Egr-1 (zif268) during in vitro classical conditioning.

Authors:  Maxim Mokin; Joyce Keifer
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Transsynaptic EphB/Ephrin-B signaling regulates growth of presynaptic boutons required for classical conditioning.

Authors:  Wei Li; Zhaoqing Zheng; Joyce Keifer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  BDNF-induced synaptic delivery of AMPAR subunits is differentially dependent on NMDA receptors and requires ERK.

Authors:  Wei Li; Joyce Keifer
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.877

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.