Literature DB >> 14986295

Utility of cytologic specimens in the evaluation of prognostic and predictive factors of breast cancer: current issues and future directions.

Nour Sneige1.   

Abstract

Although numerous biological and molecular markers of breast cancer have been identified over the past two decades, traditional factors such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 remain among the most useful indicators of prognosis and therapeutic response to treatment. These markers can be reliably evaluated in cytologic specimens, particularly in fine-needle aspirates (FNA) of primary or metastatic breast cancer. Accurate assessment of ER, PR, and HER-2 is critical in the treatment of breast cancer patients. A review of the literature, however, shows considerable interlaboratory variability in the detection of these markers and reporting of the test results. Because therapies are now being directed toward individual molecular targets, there is a need for increased standardization of such analyses. Current practices should follow consensus recommendations set by the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Clinical Oncology, and the results should be monitored through quality-assurance programs. The utility of cytologic specimens of breast lesions is also not limited to evaluation of individual prognostic and predictive factors. Cytologic specimens have been used successfully for genomic and proteomic studies. Such investigational studies are under way and offer great potential for revolutionizing the prediction of patient outcomes and disease response to therapy, as well as assessment of risk of developing breast cancer. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14986295     DOI: 10.1002/dc.20005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  5 in total

1.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Fine-needle aspiration biopsies for gene expression ratio-based diagnostic and prognostic tests in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Assunta De Rienzo; Lingsheng Dong; Beow Y Yeap; Roderick V Jensen; William G Richards; Gavin J Gordon; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Prognostic relevance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer revisited: The 25-year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon.

Authors:  António E Pinto; Teresa Pereira; Giovani L Silva; Saudade André
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Singular value decomposition-based regression identifies activation of endogenous signaling pathways in vivo.

Authors:  Zhandong Liu; Min Wang; James V Alvarez; Megan E Bonney; Chien-chung Chen; Celina D'Cruz; Tien-chi Pan; Mahlet G Tadesse; Lewis A Chodosh
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  FNAC of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to IAC Standardized Reporting and Comparative Study of Cytohistological Grading of Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hemlata Panwar; Pooja Ingle; Tummidi Santosh; Vandita Singh; Amit Bugalia; Nighat Hussain
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 1.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.