Literature DB >> 14986051

Colonic surveillance by CT colonography using axial images only.

John F Bruzzi1, Alan C Moss, Darren D Brennan, Padraic MacMathuna, Helen M Fenlon.   

Abstract

Patients at increased risk of colon cancer require strict colon surveillance. Our objective was to establish the efficacy of 2D axial CT colonography as a surveillance test when performed in routine clinical practice. Eighty-two patients at increased risk of colon cancer underwent CT colonography followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same morning. CT colonography studies were performed on a four-ring multidetector CT scanner (100 mAs, 120 kVp, 4 x 2.5 collimation) and were interpreted by two radiologists using 2D axial images only. Results were correlated with findings at colonoscopy. Note was made of subsequent histology reports from polypectomy specimens. A total of 52 polyps were detected at colonoscopy. Using 2D axial images alone, with no recourse to 2D multiplanar or 3D views, the sensitivity of CT colonography was 100, 33 and 19% for polyps larger than 9, 6-9 and smaller than 6 mm, respectively. Per-patient specificities were 98.8, 96 and 81.5%, respectively. Twenty-nine percent of polyps smaller than 1 cm were adenomatous and there were no histological features of severe dysplasia. CT colonography is a useful colon surveillance tool for patients at increased risk of colon cancer. It has a high specificity for identifying patients who should proceed to colonoscopy and polypectomy, while allowing further colon examination to be deferred in patients with normal studies. Using 2D axial images only, CT colonography can be performed as part of the daily CT workload, with a very low rate of referral for unnecessary colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14986051     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2244-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography.

Authors:  M M Morrin; R J Farrell; J B Kruskal; K Reynolds; J B McGee; V Raptopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.

Authors:  Maria H Svensson; Elisabeth Svensson; Anders Lasson; Mikael Hellström
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography.

Authors:  Thomas Gluecker; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Paul Pescatore; Pierre Schnyder; Joachim Delarive; Philippe Jornod; Reto Meuli; Gian Dorta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C S Fuchs; E L Giovannucci; G A Colditz; D J Hunter; F E Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.

Authors:  Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; William S Harmsen; Kenneth P Offord; Ann M Harris; Lynn A Wilson; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.

Authors:  Michael Macari; Edmund J Bini; Xiaonan Xue; Andrew Milano; Seth S Katz; Daniel Resnick; Hersh Chandarana; Glen Krinsky; Klaus Klingenbeck; Christopher H Marshall; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Riccardo Iannaccone; Andrea Laghi; Carlo Catalano; Filippo Mangiapane; Francesca Piacentini; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps.

Authors:  A H Dachman; J K Kuniyoshi; C M Boyle; Y Samara; K R Hoffmann; D T Rubin; I Hanan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.

Authors:  W Luboldt; C Tryon; M Kroll; T L Toussaint; K Holzer; N Hoepffner; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The future of virtual colonography. Interview by Paul C Adams.

Authors:  Helen Fenlon
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps.

Authors:  Markus S Juchems; Thorsten R Fleiter; Sandra Pauls; Stefan A Schmidt; Hans-Jürgen Brambs; Andrik J Aschoff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.

Authors:  Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zoepf; Michael Nuefer; Florian Grabellus; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 23.059

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.