BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of worrying information about chemical pollution on subjective symptoms in response to an odor that was previously associated with symptom episodes. METHODS: Ammonia and butyric acid in harmless concentrations were used as odor cues, and 10% CO2-enriched air was used to induce symptoms. One of two odors was consistently mixed with CO2-enriched air while the other odor was presented in room air during 80 s breathing trials (three trials of each). Next, information framing the experiment in the context of possible health-damaging effects of chemical pollution of our environment was presented to half the participants, whereas no information was given to the other half. Finally, both odor cues were presented with room air. Symptom scores were used as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, participants reported more symptoms in response to the odor previously presented with air than to the odor previously presented with CO2-enriched air. Post-hoc analyses suggested a crucial role for perceived rather than actual contingencies between odor and symptom episodes. Information manipulation had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Believing that a specific odor cue was associated with a symptom episode was more important than the actual association in order to provoke symptoms in response to harmless odor cues.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of worrying information about chemical pollution on subjective symptoms in response to an odor that was previously associated with symptom episodes. METHODS:Ammonia and butyric acid in harmless concentrations were used as odor cues, and 10% CO2-enriched air was used to induce symptoms. One of two odors was consistently mixed with CO2-enriched air while the other odor was presented in room air during 80 s breathing trials (three trials of each). Next, information framing the experiment in the context of possible health-damaging effects of chemical pollution of our environment was presented to half the participants, whereas no information was given to the other half. Finally, both odor cues were presented with room air. Symptom scores were used as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, participants reported more symptoms in response to the odor previously presented with air than to the odor previously presented with CO2-enriched air. Post-hoc analyses suggested a crucial role for perceived rather than actual contingencies between odor and symptom episodes. Information manipulation had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Believing that a specific odor cue was associated with a symptom episode was more important than the actual association in order to provoke symptoms in response to harmless odor cues.
Authors: O Van den Bergh; S Devriese; W Winters; H Veulemans; B Nemery; P Eelen; K P Van de Woestijne Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Winnie Winters; Stephan Devriese; Ilse Van Diest; Benoit Nemery; Hendrik Veulemans; Paul Eelen; Karel Van de Woestijne; Omer Van den Bergh Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: S Devriese; W Winters; K Stegen; I Van Diest; H Veulemans; B Nemery; P Eelen; K Van de Woestijne; O Van den Bergh Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Sine Skovbjerg; Robert Zachariae; Alice Rasmussen; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Jesper Elberling Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 3.674