Literature DB >> 14985964

Prognosis of patients aged 80 years and over admitted in medical intensive care unit.

Ariane Boumendil1, Eric Maury, Ingrid Reinhard, Laurence Luquel, Georges Offenstadt, Bertrand Guidet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic indicators of long-term survival after admission to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) for patients aged 80 years and over. DESIGN. Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A 14-bed MICU in a 970-bed, acute care, tertiary, university hospital in Paris, France. PATIENTS: A total of 233 patients aged 80 years and over discharged from a MICU during a 2-year period.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Severity at admission was estimated using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score. The underlying condition was classified using the MacCabe classification. The functional status was assessed using the Knaus classification. The outcome after MICU discharge was determined after a median 2-year follow-up. The functional outcome was assessed by telephone interviews, employing the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). The in-MICU mortality was 19.5% including death occurring during the 2 days following discharge. The long-term survival rates for patients admitted to the MICU were 59% at 2 months, 33% at 2 years, and 29% at 3 years. The multivariate analysis identified two prognostic factors of death after discharge: presence of an underlying fatal disease (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.6) and severe functional limitation (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.6). The IADL was excellent or good for 56% of the surviving patients.
CONCLUSION: Long-term survival after MICU is mainly related to the underlying condition, whereas known factors for in-MICU survival do not influence long-term prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14985964     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-2150-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  39 in total

1.  Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.

Authors:  M B Hamel; J Lynn; J M Teno; K E Covinsky; A W Wu; A Galanos; N A Desbiens; R S Phillips
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Outcomes of critically ill elderly patients: is high-dependency care for geriatric patients worthwhile?

Authors:  S P Ip; Y F Leung; C Y Ip; W P Mak
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox regression model.

Authors:  D G Altman; P K Andersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Are aggressive treatment strategies less cost-effective for older patients? The case of ventilator support and aggressive care for patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  M B Hamel; R S Phillips; R B Davis; J Teno; N Desbiens; J Lynn; J Tsevat
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments.

Authors:  W A Knaus; F E Harrell; J Lynn; L Goldman; R S Phillips; A F Connors; N V Dawson; W J Fulkerson; R M Califf; N Desbiens; P Layde; R K Oye; P E Bellamy; R B Hakim; D P Wagner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Factors influencing intensive care unit survival for critically ill elderly patients.

Authors:  R M Kleinpell; C E Ferrans
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis.

Authors:  C Brun-Buisson; F Doyon; J Carlet; P Dellamonica; F Gouin; A Lepoutre; J C Mercier; G Offenstadt; B Régnier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Hospital costs in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation: does age have an impact?

Authors:  Lakshmipathi Chelluri; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Steven H Belle; Armando J Rotondi; Derek C Angus; Michael P Donahoe; Carl A Sirio; Richard Schulz; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Long-term outcome of critically ill elderly patients requiring intensive care.

Authors:  L Chelluri; M R Pinsky; M P Donahoe; A Grenvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Jun 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  [Long-term outcome of elderly patients after intensive care treatment].

Authors:  M Wehler
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2004. III. Outcome, ICU organisation, scoring, quality of life, ethics, psychological problems and communication in the ICU, immunity and hemodynamics during sepsis, pediatric and neonatal critical care, experimental studies.

Authors:  Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Elderly patients and intensive care medicine.

Authors:  Ariane Boumendil; Bertrand Guidet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Should elderly patients be admitted to the intensive care unit?

Authors:  Ariane Boumendil; Dominique Somme; Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas; Bertrand Guidet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  [Intensive care medicine for the oldest old--progress or mistake?].

Authors:  Andreas Valentin
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Functional trajectories among older persons before and after critical illness.

Authors:  Lauren E Ferrante; Margaret A Pisani; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda S Leo-Summers; Thomas M Gill
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Short-term and long-term mortality in very elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit.

Authors:  S E de Rooij; A Govers; J C Korevaar; A Abu-Hanna; M Levi; E de Jonge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Decision-making process, outcome, and 1-year quality of life of octogenarians referred for intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Jean-François Timsit; Luc Montuclard; Alain Colvez; Olivier Gattolliat; François Philippart; Guillaume Rigal; Benoit Misset; Jean Carlet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Short- and long-term outcomes of older patients in intermediate care units.

Authors:  Olga H Torres; Esther Francia; Vanesa Longobardi; Ignasi Gich; Salvador Benito; Domingo Ruiz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Very old patients admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a multi-centre cohort analysis.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Steve A R Webb; Anthony Delaney; Carol George; David Pilcher; Graeme K Hart; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.