Literature DB >> 14984113

The autopsy in modern undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study of uses and curriculum considerations.

Julian L Burton1.   

Abstract

AIM: Medical education has undergone dramatic changes over the past decade. In the UK, the General Medical Council (GMC), the driving force behind curriculum reform, now requires curricula to be founded on a base of educational theory and research. This qualitative study investigated the roles of the autopsy within the context of the modern medical curriculum.
METHODS: Using a phenomenological methodology, a non-representative 'theoretical sample' was selected to include medical educators with a wide range of teaching experience and responsibilities and disparate views both for and against the autopsy. Semistructured, tape-recorded interviews were undertaken to investigate the roles of the autopsy within the medical curriculum. Anonymised interview transcripts were subjected to a themed content analysis.
RESULTS: Theoretical saturation was reached after 9 interviews. No new themes were added by a further 5 interviews. All the interviews were polythematic. In all, 43 themes were identified. In addition to confirming overt uses of the autopsy reported in previous studies, educators identified issues of curriculum design and development, the impact on the hidden curriculum, and a range of disadvantages and alternatives to the autopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: Educators continue to perceive the autopsy as having a multifactorial role in providing the doctors of tomorrow with the appropriate knowledge and attitudes needed for the practice of medicine in the 21st century.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14984113     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01710.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  13 in total

1.  Medical educators' personal attitudes towards the necropsy.

Authors:  J L Burton
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Videos have a role in postgraduate necropsy education.

Authors:  J L Burton; G Diercks-O'Brien; G N Rutty
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Incorporation of autopsy case-based learning into PhD graduate education: a novel approach to bridging the "bench-to-bedside" gap.

Authors:  Erin G Brooks; Joanne M Thornton; Erik A Ranheim; Zsuzsanna Fabry
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Autopsy in undergraduate medical education--what do students really learn?

Authors:  Sven Anders; Martina Mueller; Jan-Peter Sperhake; Corinna Petersen-Ewert; Sarah Schiekirka; Tobias Raupach
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Restoration of an academic historical gross pathology collection-refreshed impact on current medical teaching?

Authors:  Philip Eichhorn; Udo Andraschke; Fritz Dross; Carol I Geppert; Arndt Hartmann; Tilman T Rau
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Histological examination has a major impact on macroscopic necropsy diagnoses.

Authors:  F D C Bernardi; P H N Saldiva; T Mauad
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Necropsy practice after the "organ retention scandal": requests, performance, and tissue retention.

Authors:  J L Burton; J C E Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  The Hidden Curricula of Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Carlton Lawrence; Tsholofelo Mhlaba; Kearsley A Stewart; Relebohile Moletsane; Bernhard Gaede; Mosa Moshabela
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 9.  The value of postmortem experience in undergraduate medical education: current perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew R Bamber; Thelma A Quince
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-03-11

10.  A survey study on student preferences regarding pathology teaching in Germany: a call for curricular modernization.

Authors:  Florian E M Herrmann; Markus Lenski; Julius Steffen; Magdalena Kailuweit; Marc Nikolaus; Rajasekaran Koteeswaran; Andreas Sailer; Anna Hanszke; Maximilian Wintergerst; Sissi Dittmer; Doris Mayr; Orsolya Genzel-Boroviczény; Diann S Eley; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.