Literature DB >> 14983501

Survival among women with borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian carcinoma: a population-based analysis.

Mark E Sherman1, Pamela J Mink, Rochelle Curtis, Timothy R Cote, Sandra Brooks, Patricia Hartge, Susan Devesa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serous and mucinous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (LMP-S and LMP-M, respectively) are noninvasive tumors that portend excellent survival when confined to the ovary. Comparison of the survival for women with LMP tumors staged as distant with women who have carcinoma may have important implications for diagnostic terminology and clinical management.
METHODS: The authors compared relative survival rates among patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors during the period 1988-1999 (with follow-up through 2000) by histologic type, disease stage, tumor grade (for carcinomas), and patient age, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.
RESULTS: The overall relative survival rate at 10 years (+/- 1.96 standard errors) was 96.9% +/- 2.3% for women with LMP-S tumors, 30.4% +/- 1.7% for women with serous carcinoma (CA-S); 94.0% +/- 3.1% for women with LMP-M tumors, and 64.7% +/- 3.4% for women with mucinous carcinoma (CA-M). The survival rate at 10 years for women with distant-stage LMP-S tumors was 89.9% +/- 5.3%, compared with 96.1% +/- 8.6% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-S. The survival rate for women with distant-stage LMP-M tumors at 5 years was 85.5% +/- 9.0%, compared with 95.5% +/- 3.4% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-M (data for 10 years were limited). Mucinous ovarian neoplasms were associated with an excess of second malignancies of the digestive tract.
CONCLUSIONS: Relative survival among women with distant-stage LMP tumors was not 100% and resembled the survival of women who had carcinoma exhibiting favorable prognostic features (localized stage). Future studies of women with high-stage LMP tumors are required to clarify the pathogenesis of extraovarian lesions and their implications for management and prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14983501     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  37 in total

1.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  [Morphology of secondary ovarian tumors and metastases].

Authors:  L-C Horn; J Einenkel; R Handzel; A K Höhn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancers and low malignant potential tumors.

Authors:  Hugo Arias-Pulido; Harriet O Smith; Nancy E Joste; Therese Bocklage; Clifford R Qualls; Allison Chavez; Eric R Prossnitz; Claire F Verschraegen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Management of Borderline Ovarian Tumors-Still a Gray Zone.

Authors:  Nidhi Nayyar; Prerna Lakhwani; Ashish Goel; Pankaj Kr Pande; Kapil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-25

Review 5.  Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; Michal Zikan; Pavel Dundr; David Cibula
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-28

6.  Role of hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of early-stage borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Hiroko Machida; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Brendan H Grubbs; Lynda D Roman; Anil K Sood; David M Gershenson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Long-term Behavior of Serous Borderline Tumors Subdivided Into Atypical Proliferative Tumors and Noninvasive Low-grade Carcinomas: A Population-based Clinicopathologic Study of 942 Cases.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Charlotte G Hannibal; Jette Junge; Kirsten Frederiksen; Susanne K Kjaer; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  A nationwide study of serous "borderline" ovarian tumors in Denmark 1978-2002: centralized pathology review and overall survival compared with the general population.

Authors:  Charlotte Gerd Hannibal; Russell Vang; Jette Junge; Kirsten Frederiksen; Anette Kjaerbye-Thygesen; Klaus Kaae Andersen; Ann Tabor; Robert J Kurman; Susanne K Kjaer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Borderline ovarian tumor in pregnancy: can surgery wait? A case series.

Authors:  Ailyn M Vidal Urbinati; Anna D Iacobone; Raffaela C Di Pace; Ida Pino; Maria R Pittelli; Maria E Guerrieri; Eleonora P Preti; Dorella Franchi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Significance of lymph node ratio on survival of women with borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  David J Nusbaum; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Hiroko Machida; Shinya Matsuzaki; Lynda D Roman; Anil K Sood; David M Gershenson; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.