D-Y Wang1, A Chan, J D Smith. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an extremely common disease worldwide and one of the top-ten reasons for a visit to primary care clinics. This study aimed to investigate the understanding of current guidelines and concepts of management for AR among general practitioners (GPs) in Singapore. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was designed to survey the dispensing practice and understanding of current guidelines in the management of AR among Singapore GPs. RESULTS: Two hundred GPs completed the questionnaire. AR was estimated to be 10-40% of total patient visits in 50% of the primary care clinics surveyed. There was no significant difference in diagnosis and management of AR among GPs practicing solo, as a group or in polyclinics. The use of allergy tests (skin or in vitro tests) was <50%. Most physicians understood correctly the efficacy, side-effects, and cost effectiveness of first and newer generation H1-antihistamines and nasal glucocorticosteroids. However, first generation H1-antihistamines and oral/nasal decongestants are commonly used to reduce the cost of medication and to achieve quick relief from nasal obstruction. CONCLUSION: Management of allergic rhinitis is common in primary care clinics. Quick symptomatic relief with low-cost medications is a major concern for GPs in the management of AR, as it will affect a patient's compliance and perception of efficacy. However, inappropriate use of decongestants and other nonevidence-based therapies should not be recommended. Implementing the current evidence-based international guidelines for AR needs to be improved.
BACKGROUND:Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an extremely common disease worldwide and one of the top-ten reasons for a visit to primary care clinics. This study aimed to investigate the understanding of current guidelines and concepts of management for AR among general practitioners (GPs) in Singapore. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was designed to survey the dispensing practice and understanding of current guidelines in the management of AR among Singapore GPs. RESULTS: Two hundred GPs completed the questionnaire. AR was estimated to be 10-40% of total patient visits in 50% of the primary care clinics surveyed. There was no significant difference in diagnosis and management of AR among GPs practicing solo, as a group or in polyclinics. The use of allergy tests (skin or in vitro tests) was <50%. Most physicians understood correctly the efficacy, side-effects, and cost effectiveness of first and newer generation H1-antihistamines and nasal glucocorticosteroids. However, first generation H1-antihistamines and oral/nasal decongestants are commonly used to reduce the cost of medication and to achieve quick relief from nasal obstruction. CONCLUSION: Management of allergic rhinitis is common in primary care clinics. Quick symptomatic relief with low-cost medications is a major concern for GPs in the management of AR, as it will affect a patient's compliance and perception of efficacy. However, inappropriate use of decongestants and other nonevidence-based therapies should not be recommended. Implementing the current evidence-based international guidelines for AR needs to be improved.
Authors: Baharudin Abdullah; Ramaprabah Kandiah; Nik Fariza Husna Nik Hassan; Ahmad Filza Ismail; Zahiruddin Wan Mohammad; De Yun Wang Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 4.084