OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of weight cycling independent of BMI and weight change in predicting the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A six-year follow-up of 46,634 young and middle-aged women in the Nurses' Health Study II was conducted. Women who had intentionally lost > or = 20 lbs at least three times between 1989 and 1993 were classified as severe weight cyclers. Women who had intentionally lost > or = 10 lbs at least three times were classified as mild weight cyclers. The outcome was physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1993, approximately 20% of the women were mild weight cyclers, and 1.6% were severe weight cyclers. BMI in 1993 was positively associated with weight-cycling status (p < 0.001). During 6 years of follow-up (1993 to 1999), 418 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. BMI in 1993 had a strong association with the risk of developing diabetes. Compared with women with a BMI between 17 and 22 kg/m(2), those with a BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m(2) were approximately seven times more likely to develop diabetes, and those with a BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2) were 63 times more likely to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. After adjustment for BMI, neither mild (relative risk = 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.37) nor severe (relative risk = 1.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 2.13) weight cycling predicted risk of diabetes. DISCUSSION: Weight cycling was strongly associated with BMI, but it was not independently predictive of developing type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of weight cycling independent of BMI and weight change in predicting the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A six-year follow-up of 46,634 young and middle-aged women in the Nurses' Health Study II was conducted. Women who had intentionally lost > or = 20 lbs at least three times between 1989 and 1993 were classified as severe weight cyclers. Women who had intentionally lost > or = 10 lbs at least three times were classified as mild weight cyclers. The outcome was physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1993, approximately 20% of the women were mild weight cyclers, and 1.6% were severe weight cyclers. BMI in 1993 was positively associated with weight-cycling status (p < 0.001). During 6 years of follow-up (1993 to 1999), 418 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. BMI in 1993 had a strong association with the risk of developing diabetes. Compared with women with a BMI between 17 and 22 kg/m(2), those with a BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m(2) were approximately seven times more likely to develop diabetes, and those with a BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2) were 63 times more likely to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. After adjustment for BMI, neither mild (relative risk = 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.37) nor severe (relative risk = 1.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 2.13) weight cycling predicted risk of diabetes. DISCUSSION: Weight cycling was strongly associated with BMI, but it was not independently predictive of developing type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Merja Kataja-Tuomola; Jari Sundell; Satu Männistö; Mikko J Virtanen; Jukka Kontto; Demetrius Albanes; Jarmo Virtamo Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Caitlin Mason; Karen E Foster-Schubert; Ikuyo Imayama; Liren Xiao; Angela Kong; Kristin L Campbell; Catherine R Duggan; Ching-Yun Wang; Catherine M Alfano; Cornelia M Ulrich; George L Blackburn; Anne McTiernan Journal: Metabolism Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Coen H van Gool; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Brenda W J H Penninx; Jung Sun Lee; Susan M Rubin; Frances A Tylavsky; Kristine Yaffe; Anne B Newman; Tamara B Harris; Marco Pahor; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Jason M Nagata; Andrea K Garber; Jennifer Tabler; Stuart B Murray; Eric Vittinghoff; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 4.861