Leigh Perreault1, Jennifer M Lavely, John M Kittelson, Tracy J Horton. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA. leigh.perreault@uchsc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender differences exist in lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity in response to exercise and/or insulin. Exercise and insulin are known modulators of LPL activity in men, but this is less clear in women. LPL activity may predict propensity for obesity; therefore, understanding its modulators is of considerable importance. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Gender differences in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue LPL activity were determined after a single bout of exercise followed by a hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp and compared with an identical rest day in healthy lean men (n = 10) and women (n = 10). Muscle and adipose tissue biopsies were obtained pre- (post-exercise vs. rest) and post-clamp. RESULTS: Basal levels of muscle and adipose tissue LPL activity were not different between men and women. There was, however, a significant gender by day interaction for muscle LPL activity (p = 0.023) and adipose tissue LPL activity (p = 0.013). In muscle, this was because of a significant increase in LPL activity on the exercise vs. rest day in men (p < 0.001) but not women. Adipose tissue LPL activity also increased significantly in men on the exercise day relative to rest day (p = 0.04) but decreased in women (p = 0.10). The hyperinulinemic/euglycemic clamp had no independent effect on tissue LPL activity, in either gender, after rest or exercise. DISCUSSION: In the 3 to 4 hours after exercise, muscle and adipose tissue LPL activity increased significantly in men, whereas LPL activity remained unchanged in women.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender differences exist in lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity in response to exercise and/or insulin. Exercise and insulin are known modulators of LPL activity in men, but this is less clear in women. LPL activity may predict propensity for obesity; therefore, understanding its modulators is of considerable importance. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Gender differences in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue LPL activity were determined after a single bout of exercise followed by a hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp and compared with an identical rest day in healthy lean men (n = 10) and women (n = 10). Muscle and adipose tissue biopsies were obtained pre- (post-exercise vs. rest) and post-clamp. RESULTS: Basal levels of muscle and adipose tissue LPL activity were not different between men and women. There was, however, a significant gender by day interaction for muscle LPL activity (p = 0.023) and adipose tissue LPL activity (p = 0.013). In muscle, this was because of a significant increase in LPL activity on the exercise vs. rest day in men (p < 0.001) but not women. Adipose tissue LPL activity also increased significantly in men on the exercise day relative to rest day (p = 0.04) but decreased in women (p = 0.10). The hyperinulinemic/euglycemic clamp had no independent effect on tissue LPL activity, in either gender, after rest or exercise. DISCUSSION: In the 3 to 4 hours after exercise, muscle and adipose tissue LPL activity increased significantly in men, whereas LPL activity remained unchanged in women.
Authors: Elena Bellou; Aikaterina Siopi; Maria Galani; Maria Maraki; Yiannis E Tsekouras; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Stavros A Kavouras; Faidon Magkos; Labros S Sidossis Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Michael T Durheim; Cris A Slentz; Lori A Bateman; Stephanie K Mabe; William E Kraus Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-06-10 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Stacy L Schmidt; Daniel H Bessesen; Sarah Stotz; Frederick F Peelor; Benjamin F Miller; Tracy J Horton Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2014-09-04
Authors: Michael Harrison; Niall M Moyna; Theodore W Zderic; Donal J O'Gorman; Noel McCaffrey; Brian P Carson; Marc T Hamilton Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.876