OBJECTIVE: To study the association between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) characteristics and stroke etiology, stroke severity, and functional outcome in patients with infratentorial strokes. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 22 consecutive patients with acute infratentorial strokes. They used a blinded comparison of DWI features (number, distribution, and volume of lesions) with clinical characteristics, namely, stroke etiology (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment [TOAST] classification), severity (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), length of stay (LOS), and functional 3-month outcome using modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, and a dichotomized outcome status (living at home vs institutionalization or death). RESULTS: Acute infratentorial DWI lesions were detected in 95% (21/22) of the patients. The number (p = 0.01) and the distribution (p < 0.001) of DWI lesions were correlated with stroke etiology. Patients with cardioembolic strokes (n = 5) had more DWI lesions (8.0 +/- 6.0) than those with other stroke etiologies (n = 17; 1.3 +/- 0.9; p < 0.001). Their lesion distribution differed from that of patients with noncardioembolic strokes (p < 0.001). Clinically silent, acute DWI lesions in the anterior circulation in addition to their infratentorial lesions were visualized in 3 of 5 patients with cardioembolic stroke and in none of 17 patients without sources of cardioembolism (p < 0.001). Pure infratentorial lesions were present in 15 of 17 patients with noncardioembolic strokes and in none of 5 cardioembolic stroke patients (p < 0.001). DWI lesion volume was not correlated with NIHSS score, LOS, outcome scores, or outcome status. CONCLUSION: In infratentorial strokes, multiple DWI lesions and a distribution of subsidiary, clinically silent DWI lesions in the anterior circulation suggest a cardioembolic stroke etiology. However, DWI lesion volume did not correlate with the NIHSS score and was no predictor of outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To study the association between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) characteristics and stroke etiology, stroke severity, and functional outcome in patients with infratentorial strokes. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 22 consecutive patients with acute infratentorial strokes. They used a blinded comparison of DWI features (number, distribution, and volume of lesions) with clinical characteristics, namely, stroke etiology (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment [TOAST] classification), severity (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), length of stay (LOS), and functional 3-month outcome using modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, and a dichotomized outcome status (living at home vs institutionalization or death). RESULTS: Acute infratentorial DWI lesions were detected in 95% (21/22) of the patients. The number (p = 0.01) and the distribution (p < 0.001) of DWI lesions were correlated with stroke etiology. Patients with cardioembolic strokes (n = 5) had more DWI lesions (8.0 +/- 6.0) than those with other stroke etiologies (n = 17; 1.3 +/- 0.9; p < 0.001). Their lesion distribution differed from that of patients with noncardioembolic strokes (p < 0.001). Clinically silent, acute DWI lesions in the anterior circulation in addition to their infratentorial lesions were visualized in 3 of 5 patients with cardioembolic stroke and in none of 17 patients without sources of cardioembolism (p < 0.001). Pure infratentorial lesions were present in 15 of 17 patients with noncardioembolic strokes and in none of 5 cardioembolic strokepatients (p < 0.001). DWI lesion volume was not correlated with NIHSS score, LOS, outcome scores, or outcome status. CONCLUSION: In infratentorial strokes, multiple DWI lesions and a distribution of subsidiary, clinically silent DWI lesions in the anterior circulation suggest a cardioembolic stroke etiology. However, DWI lesion volume did not correlate with the NIHSS score and was no predictor of outcome.
Authors: T Seifert; C Enzinger; M K Storch; G Pichler; K Niederkorn; F Fazekas Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Christopher J Swearingen; Barbara C Tilley; Robert J Adams; Zoran Rumboldt; Joyce S Nicholas; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Robert F Woolson Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: I Mourand; P Machi; E Nogué; C Arquizan; V Costalat; M-C Picot; A Bonafé; D Milhaud Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tomáš Dorňák; Michal Král; Zuzana Sedláčková; Daniel Šaňák; Eva Čecháková; Petra Divišová; Jana Zapletalová; Petr Kaňovský Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 6.829