Literature DB >> 14980592

Non-surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery.

Soon-Jung Hwang1, Piet E Haers, Burkhardt Seifert, Hermann F Sailer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Condylar resorption following orthognathic surgery is an important cause of late skeletal relapse. However, its pathogenesis is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to find non-surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. PATIENTS: In this retrospective study, 17 patients (Group I) who developed postoperative condylar resorption were selected. These patients were compared with 22 patients (Group II) without postoperative condylar resorption, but who showed mandibular hypoplasia with a preoperative high mandibular plane angle of more than 40 degrees.
METHODS: Possible non-surgical risk factors were sought by analysing clinical and radiological data collected preoperatively and immediately, 6 weeks, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference of gender distribution between the two groups. Patients in Group I were significantly younger (p=0.02) than those in Group II. The incidence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in both groups was similar preoperatively, but was significantly higher (p=0.001) postoperatively in Group I. The posterior inclination of the condylar neck in Group I was also significantly greater (p<0.001). The preoperative mandibular plane angle in Group I (mean value: 49.4 degrees ) was significantly greater (p=0.005) than in Group II (mean value: 44.9 degrees ). The preoperative SNB angle, overbite, and posterior facial height and ratio (posterior/anterior facial heights) in Group I were significantly smaller (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the posteriorly inclined condylar neck should be considered as a relevant non-surgical risk factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14980592     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2003.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of condylar morphology following orthognathic surgery on digital panoramic radiographs. Could methodology influence the range of "normality" in condylar changes?

Authors:  P Scolozzi; A Momjian; D S Courvoisier; S Kiliaridis
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Long-term stability and condylar remodeling after mandibular advancement: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lauren Ehardt; Antonio Ruellas; Sean Edwards; Erika Benavides; Matthew Ames; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Skeletal relapse following sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement.

Authors:  Nanda Kishore Sahoo; Balakrishnan Jayan; Ankur Thakral; Vishvaroop Nagpal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-09-13

4.  Complications after orthognathic surgery: our experience on 423 cases.

Authors:  Marco Friscia; Carolina Sbordone; Marzia Petrocelli; Luigi Angelo Vaira; Federica Attanasi; Francesco Maria Cassandro; Mariano Paternoster; Giorgio Iaconetta; Luigi Califano
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-02

5.  Condylar geometry variation is associated with ENPP1 variant in a population of patients with dento-facial deformities.

Authors:  Marion Constant; Romain Nicot; Alexandre R Vieira; Gwenael Raoul; James J Sciote; Joel Ferri
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement surgery and disc repositioning: can condylar remodeling in the long-term follow-up be predicted?

Authors:  L R Gomes; L H Cevidanes; M R Gomes; A C Ruellas; D P Ryan; B Paniagua; L M Wolford; J R Gonçalves
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Positional change of the condyle after orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment: is there a relationship to skeletal relapse?

Authors:  Husanov Zafar; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha; Young-Wook Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-26

8.  Three-dimensional assessment of condylar surface changes and remodeling after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Jung-Hye Lee; Woo-Jin Lee; Jae-Myung Shin; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-03-24

9.  Effect of post-orthognathic surgery condylar axis changes on condylar morphology as determined by 3-dimensional surface reconstruction.

Authors:  Soo-Bum An; Soo-Byung Park; Yong-Il Kim; Woo-Sung Son
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.