Literature DB >> 14980187

Qualitative research and the epidemiological imagination: a vital relationship.

J Popay1.   

Abstract

This paper takes as its starting point the assumption that the 'Epidemiological Imagination' has a central role to play in the future development of policies and practice to improve population health and reduce health inequalities within and between states but suggests that by neglecting the contribution that qualitative research can make epidemiology is failing to deliver this potential. The paper briefly considers what qualitative research is, touching on epistemological questions--what type of "knowledge" is generated--and questions of methods--what approaches to data collection, analysis and interpretation are involved). Following this the paper presents two different models of the relationship between qualitative and quantitative research. The enhancement model (which assumes that qualitative research findings add something extra to the findings of quantitative research) suggests three related "roles" for qualitative research: generating hypothesis to be tested by quantitative research, helping to construct more sophisticated measures of social phenomena and explaining unexpected research from quantitative research. In contrast, the Epistemological Model suggests that qualitative research is equal but different from quantitative research making a unique contribution through: researching parts other research approaches can't reach, increasing understanding by adding conceptual and theoretical depth to knowledge, shifting the balance of power between researchers and researched and challenging traditional epidemiological ways of "knowing" the social world. The paper illustrates these different types of contributions with examples of qualitative research and finally discusses ways in which the "trustworthiness" of qualitative research can be assessed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14980187     DOI: 10.1157/13057793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gac Sanit        ISSN: 0213-9111            Impact factor:   2.139


  5 in total

1.  Core indicators evaluation of effectiveness of HIV-AIDS preventive-control programmes carried out by nongovernmental organizations. A mixed method study.

Authors:  Anna Berenguera; Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera; Concepció Violan; Amparo Romaguera; Rosa Mansilla; Albert Giménez; Carlos Ascaso; Jesús Almeda
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from 'what works' to 'what happens'.

Authors:  Mark Petticrew
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-28

3.  A qualitative study of barriers to and facilitators of optimal engagement in care among PLWH and substance use/misuse.

Authors:  Kamini E Kuchinad; Heidi E Hutton; Anne K Monroe; Garrick Anderson; Richard D Moore; Geetanjali Chander
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-04-22

4.  Are residents of downtown Toronto influenced by their urban neighbourhoods? Using concept mapping to examine neighbourhood characteristics and their perceived impact on self-rated mental well-being.

Authors:  Amanda J Sheppard; Christina Salmon; Priya Balasubramaniam; Janet Parsons; Gita Singh; Amina Jabbar; Qamar Zaidi; Allison Scott; Rosane Nisenbaum; Jim Dunn; Jason Ramsay; Nasim Haque; Patricia O'Campo
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 5.  What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Marjorie MacDonald; Marilyn Plummer; Judy Burgess; Wendy Neander
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2016-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.