Literature DB >> 14980157

[Statistical approaches to evaluate agreement].

Josep Lluís Carrasco1, Lluís Jover.   

Abstract

Reliability and agreement of measurement methods is a fundamental issue in health sciences which is not usually borne in mind. In this document the connotations of using measurement methods with error and the switchability among measurements from methods which disagree are highlighted. These implications are illustrated through examples showing up the confounding effect that measurement error can produce. Throughout the document several procedures to assess agreement and to identify the error sources are suggested. These procedures are classified according to the sort of data, quantitative or qualitative data, as well as the way of agreement is assessed, in an aggregate way by means a values or in a disaggregate way analysing separately the error sources. By means of these procedures is showed that frequently used approaches to assess agreement as the averages comparison, the correlation coefficient or the regression model appear as insufficient or inadequate approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14980157     DOI: 10.1157/13057543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)        ISSN: 0025-7753            Impact factor:   1.725


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical value of blood pressure measurement in the community pharmacy.

Authors:  Daniel Sabater-Hernández; Inés Azpilicueta; Pablo Sánchez-Villegas; Pedro Amariles; María I Baena; María J Faus
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-07-23

2.  Reliability of drug-induced sedation endoscopy: interobserver agreement.

Authors:  Marina Carrasco-Llatas; Vanessa Zerpa-Zerpa; José Dalmau-Galofre
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Clinical validity of a population database definition of remission in patients with major depression.

Authors:  Antoni Sicras-Mainar; Milagrosa Blanca-Tamayo; Laura Gutiérrez-Nicuesa; Jordi Salvatella-Pasant; Ruth Navarro-Artieda
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Agreement between community pharmacy and ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement methods to assess the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment: the MEPAFAR study.

Authors:  Daniel Sabater-Hernández; Alejandro De La Sierra; Pablo Sánchez-Villegas; Fidelina M Santana-Pérez; Luisa Merino-Barber; María J Faus
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Evaluation of a New Digital Automated Glycemic Pattern Detection Tool.

Authors:  María José Comellas; Emma Albiñana; Maite Artes; Rosa Corcoy; Diego Fernández-García; Jorge García-Alemán; Beatriz García-Cuartero; Cintia González; María Teresa Rivero; Núria Casamira; Jörg Weissmann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  [Clinical validation of 2 morbidity groups in the primary care setting].

Authors:  Montse Clèries; David Monterde; Emili Vela; Àlex Guarga; Luis García Eroles; Pol Pérez Sust
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 1.137

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.