Literature DB >> 14980090

A comparison of in-person examination and video otoscope imaging for tympanostomy tube follow-up.

Chris Patricoski1, John Kokesh, A Stewart Ferguson, Kathryn Koller, Greg Zwack, Ellen Provost, Peter Holck.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if video otoscope still images (640 x 480 pixel resolution) of the tympanic membrane following surgical placement of tympanostomy tubes are comparable to an in-person microscopic examination. Forty patients having undergone tympanostomy tube placement in both ears were independently examined in-person by two otolaryngologists and imaged using a video otoscope and telemedicine software package. The two physicians later reviewed images at 6 and 12 weeks. Physical examination findings and diagnosis were documented and compared for their concordance using kappa statistics. For both physicians, the intraprovider concordance between the in-person examination and the corresponding image review was high for each of the physical examination findings: Tube In 93-94% (K 0.85-0.87), Tube Patent 86-93% (K 0.74-0.85), Drainage 94-98% (K 0.42-0.66), Perforation 85-98% (K 0.40-0.84), Granulation 95-99% (K -0.01 to 0.00), Middle Ear Fluid 89-91% (K -0.03 to 0.50), and Retracted 89-94% (K 0.13-0.43). These agreement rates are similar to the normal interprovider concordance observed when two physicians independently examined the same patient in-person for physical exam findings: Tube In 96% (K 0.93), Tube Patent 94% (K 0.88), Drainage 96% (K 0.56), Perforation 90% (K 0.60), Granulation 96% (K 0.39), Middle Ear Fluid 88% (K 0.14), and Retracted 91% (K 0.43). For both physicians, the intraprovider diagnostic concordance between the in-person examination and the corresponding image review was high 79-85% (K 0.67-0.76). The interprovider diagnostic concordance for the in-person exam was 88% (K 0.81). The interprovider diagnostic concordance when two physicians independently reviewed all images was 84% (K 0.74), and 89% (K 0.80) when poor images were excluded. This study demonstrates that physician review of video otoscope images is comparable to an in-person microscopic examination. Store-and-forward video otoscopy may be an acceptable method of following patients post-tympanostomy tube placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14980090     DOI: 10.1089/153056203772744653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  11 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in access to pediatric hearing health care.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Michael R Kaufman; Beth N McNulty
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Utility of telephone visits at an urban safety-net hospital during 2020: A retrospective review.

Authors:  Eric K Kim; Joseph Kidane; Shauna Brodie; Delphine S Tuot; Jeffrey D Sharon
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-30

3.  The Role of Patient-Site Facilitators in Teleaudiology: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Laura Coco; Alyssa Davidson; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Prospective Evaluation of a Smartphone Otoscope for Home Tympanostomy Tube Surveillance: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Debra M Don; Jeffrey A Koempel; Laurel M Fisher; Choo Phei Wee; Beth Osterbauer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Hearing Norton Sound: a community randomised trial protocol to address childhood hearing loss in rural Alaska.

Authors:  Susan D Emmett; Samantha Kleindienst Robler; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alain Labrique; Joseph J Gallo; Philip Hofstetter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Telemedicine in Audiology. Best practice recommendations from the French Society of Audiology (SFA) and the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL).

Authors:  H Thai-Van; D Bakhos; D Bouccara; N Loundon; M Marx; T Mom; I Mosnier; S Roman; C Villerabel; C Vincent; F Venail
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.665

7.  Identification and Management of Middle Ear Disorders in a Rural Cleft Care Program: A Telemedicine Approach.

Authors:  Vidya Ramkumar; Akilan Rajendran; Roopa Nagarajan; Subramaniyan Balasubramaniyan; Dhulase Krithega Suresh
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Telemedicine in tinnitus: feasibility, advantages, limitations, and perspectives.

Authors:  Matthieu J Guitton
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-14

9.  A cost minimisation analysis of a telepaediatric otolaryngology service.

Authors:  Cathy Q Xu; Anthony C Smith; Paul A Scuffham; Richard Wootton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Evaluation of an iPhone Otoscope in a Neurotrauma Clinic and as an Adjunct to Neurosurgical Education.

Authors:  Ronald Sahyouni; Omid Moshtaghi; Ramin Rajaii; Diem Kieu Tran; David Bustillo; Melissa Huang; Jefferson W Chen
Journal:  Insights Neurosurg       Date:  2016-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.