OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate in primary care a computerised decision support system for the management of stroke patients based upon 'patient profile decision analysis'. DESIGN: The decision support system incorporated the findings of 960 Markov models examining the decision to prescribe aspirin in the secondary prevention of stroke. The models reflected each combination of nine risk factors that determined a patient's profile. The evaluation comprised a qualitative interview and a questionnaire administered before and after the general practitioners (GPs) were given access to the support system. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: 15 GPs from the West Midlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision certainty scoring of hypothetical patient vignettes. Qualitative perceptions of the applicability and acceptability of the system for primary care. RESULTS: After using the system, GPs were more certain of their decision making and made decisions more in line with national guidelines. Quantitative results further suggested that the system made decision making easier, improved feelings of being supported, improved the quality of decision making and increased satisfaction. Qualitative themes included that GPs thought the system could clarify their own decision making and improve GP-patient dialogue. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of individualised decision analysis for general practice has been questioned. Patient profile decision analysis, however, may be a valuable means of harnessing some of the advantages of the methodology to produce more patient-specific guidelines for primary care.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate in primary care a computerised decision support system for the management of strokepatients based upon 'patient profile decision analysis'. DESIGN: The decision support system incorporated the findings of 960 Markov models examining the decision to prescribe aspirin in the secondary prevention of stroke. The models reflected each combination of nine risk factors that determined a patient's profile. The evaluation comprised a qualitative interview and a questionnaire administered before and after the general practitioners (GPs) were given access to the support system. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: 15 GPs from the West Midlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision certainty scoring of hypothetical patient vignettes. Qualitative perceptions of the applicability and acceptability of the system for primary care. RESULTS: After using the system, GPs were more certain of their decision making and made decisions more in line with national guidelines. Quantitative results further suggested that the system made decision making easier, improved feelings of being supported, improved the quality of decision making and increased satisfaction. Qualitative themes included that GPs thought the system could clarify their own decision making and improve GP-patient dialogue. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of individualised decision analysis for general practice has been questioned. Patient profile decision analysis, however, may be a valuable means of harnessing some of the advantages of the methodology to produce more patient-specific guidelines for primary care.
Authors: Annette Moxey; Jane Robertson; David Newby; Isla Hains; Margaret Williamson; Sallie-Anne Pearson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Mark H Eckman; Ruth E Wise; Katherine Naylor; Lora Arduser; Gregory Y H Lip; Brett Kissela; Matthew Flaherty; Dawn Kleindorfer; Faisal Khan; Daniel P Schauer; John Kues; Alexandru Costea Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Nicola McCleary; Craig R Ramsay; Jill J Francis; Marion K Campbell; Julia Allan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-11-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Alex Burns; Brian Donnelly; Joshua Feyi-Waboso; Elizabeth Shephard; Raff Calitri; Mark Tarrant; Sarah Gerard Dean Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 3.006