Literature DB >> 14979718

The raised midpoint potential of the [2Fe2S] cluster of cytochrome bc1 is mediated by both the Qo site occupants and the head domain position of the Fe-S protein subunit.

Jason W Cooley1, Arthur G Roberts, Michael K Bowman, David M Kramer, Fevzi Daldal.   

Abstract

We have previously reported that mutant strains of Rhodobacter capsulatus that have alanine insertions (+nAla mutants) in the hinge region of the iron sulfur (Fe-S) containing subunit of the bc(1) complex have increased redox midpoint potentials (E(m)) for their [2Fe2S] clusters. The alteration of the E(m) in these strains, which contain mutations far from the metal binding site, implied that the local environment of the metal center is indirectly altered by a change in the interaction of this subunit with the hydroquinone oxidizing (Q(o)) site [Darrouzet, E., Valkova-Valchanova, M., and Daldal, F. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 3464-3470]. Subsequently, the E(m) changes have been proposed to be predominantly due to a stronger or more stabilized hydrogen bonding between the reduced [2Fe2S] cluster and the Q(o) site inhabitant ubiquinone (Q) [Shinkarev, V. P., Kolling, D. R. J., Miller, T. J., and Crofts, A. R. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 14372-14382]. To further investigate this issue, Fe-S protein-Q interactions were monitored by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and the findings indicated that the wild type and mutant proteins interactions with Q are similar. Moreover, when the Q(pool) was chemically depleted, the E(m) of the [2Fe2S] cluster in mutant bc(1) complexes remained more positive than a similarly treated native enzyme (e.g., the [2Fe2S] E(m) of the +2Ala mutant was 55 mV more positive than the wild type). These data suggest that the increased E(m) of the [2Fe2S] cluster in the +nAla mutants is in part due to the cluster's interaction with Q, and in part to additional factors that are independent of hydrogen bonding to Q. One such factor, the possibility of a different position of the Fe-S at the Q(o) site of the mutant proteins versus the native enzyme, was addressed by determining the orientation of the [2Fe2S] cluster in the membrane using EPR spectroscopy. In the case of the +2Ala mutant, the [2Fe2S] cluster orientation in the absence of inhibitor is different than that seen in the native enzyme. However, the +2Ala mutant cluster shared a similar orientation with the native enzyme when both samples were exposed to either stigmatellin or myxothiazol. In addition, Q(pool) extracted membranes of +2Ala mutant exhibited fewer overall orientations, with the predominant one being more similar to that observed in the non-Q-depleted membranes of the +2Ala mutant than the Q-depleted membranes of a wild-type strain. Therefore, additional component(s) that are independent of Q(o) site inhabitants and that originate from the newly observed orientations of the [2Fe2S] clusters in the +nAla mutants also contribute to the increased midpoint potentials of their [2Fe2S] clusters. While the molecular basis of these components remains to be determined, salient implications of these findings in terms of Q(o) site catalysis are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14979718     DOI: 10.1021/bi035938u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  17 in total

1.  Binding dynamics at the quinone reduction (Qi) site influence the equilibrium interactions of the iron sulfur protein and hydroquinone oxidation (Qo) site of the cytochrome bc1 complex.

Authors:  Jason W Cooley; Tomoko Ohnishi; Fevzi Daldal
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  A caged, destabilized, free radical intermediate in the q-cycle.

Authors:  Preethi R Vennam; Nicholas Fisher; Matthew D Krzyaniak; David M Kramer; Michael K Bowman
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 3.  Regulatory interactions in the dimeric cytochrome bc(1) complex: the advantages of being a twin.

Authors:  Raul Covian; Bernard L Trumpower
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-04-22

Review 4.  Metalloproteins containing cytochrome, iron-sulfur, or copper redox centers.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Saumen Chakraborty; Parisa Hosseinzadeh; Yang Yu; Shiliang Tian; Igor Petrik; Ambika Bhagi; Yi Lu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Ascochlorin is a novel, specific inhibitor of the mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex.

Authors:  Edward A Berry; Li-Shar Huang; Dong-Woo Lee; Fevzi Daldal; Kazuo Nagai; Nobuko Minagawa
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-12-16

6.  Catalytic Reactions and Energy Conservation in the Cytochrome bc1 and b6f Complexes of Energy-Transducing Membranes.

Authors:  Marcin Sarewicz; Sebastian Pintscher; Rafał Pietras; Arkadiusz Borek; Łukasz Bujnowicz; Guy Hanke; William A Cramer; Giovanni Finazzi; Artur Osyczka
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Photoinitiated electron transfer within the Paracoccus denitrificans cytochrome bc1 complex: mobility of the iron-sulfur protein is modulated by the occupant of the Q(o) site.

Authors:  Jeffrey Havens; Michela Castellani; Thomas Kleinschroth; Bernd Ludwig; Bill Durham; Francis Millett
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Proton environment of reduced Rieske iron-sulfur cluster probed by two-dimensional ESEEM spectroscopy.

Authors:  Derrick R J Kolling; Rimma I Samoilova; Alexander A Shubin; Antony R Crofts; Sergei A Dikanov
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 9.  Design and use of photoactive ruthenium complexes to study electron transfer within cytochrome bc1 and from cytochrome bc1 to cytochrome c.

Authors:  Francis Millett; Jeffrey Havens; Sany Rajagukguk; Bill Durham
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-09-15

10.  Substrate redox potential controls superoxide production kinetics in the cytochrome bc complex.

Authors:  Jonathan L Cape; Divesh Aidasani; David M Kramer; Michael K Bowman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.