Literature DB >> 14978613

Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy.

Norio Saito1, Masato Ono, Masanori Sugito, Masaaki Ito, Masato Morihiro, Chihiro Kosugi, Kazunori Sato, Masahito Kotaka, Satoru Nomura, Manabu Arai, Takaya Kobatake.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Abdominoperineal resection has been the standard surgery for very low rectal cancer located within 5 cm of the anal verge. However, permanent colostomy exerts serious limitations on quality of life. The present study aimed to investigate curability and functional results of intersphincteric resection and additional partial external sphincteric resection for carcinoma of the anorectal junction.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients were prospectively studied from November 1999 to September 2002. All patients displayed adenocarcinoma (T3: n = 26; T2: n = 7; T1: n = 2) located between 0 and 2 cm above the dentate line. Abdominotransanal rectal resection with total mesorectal excision was performed in all patients (total intersphincteric resection: n = 14; subtotal intersphincteric resection: n = 5; additional partial external sphincteric resection: n = 6). All patients underwent diverting colostomy, which was closed at a median of six months postoperatively. Twenty patients received preoperative radiochemotherapy.
RESULTS: All patients had curative intent with microscopic safety margins (mean surgical cut end: 4 mm; mean distal cut end: 10 mm). No postoperative mortality was encountered. Morbidity was identified in 13 patients (perianastomotic abscess: n = 4; anastomotic leakage and fistula: n = 4; postoperative bleeding: n = 2; wound infection: n = 1; anastomotic stenosis: n = 1; anovaginal fistula: n = 1). One of these patients received a permanent colostomy. Five patients developed recurrence (liver: n = 1; lung: n = 2; local and lung: n = 1; abdominal wall: n = 1) during the median observation period (23 months). Two of these patients underwent curative resection of liver or lung metastases. Twenty-one patients have received stoma closure, and although continence was satisfactory in all, 5 displayed occasional minor soiling 12 months after stoma closure. Anal canal manometry demonstrated significant reduction in maximum resting pressure (median: 50 cmH(2)O at 12 months after stoma closure), but acceptable function results were obtained.
CONCLUSION: Curability and anal function were achieved by means of intersphincteric resection without or with additional partial external sphincteric resection. These procedures can be recommended for low rectal cancer patients who are candidates for abdominoperineal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14978613     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-003-0088-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  32 in total

1.  Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Oncological outcomes of transanal local excision for high risk T(1) rectal cancers.

Authors:  Ze-Yu Wu; Gang Zhao; Zhe Chen; Jia-Lin Du; Jin Wan; Feng Lin; Lin Peng
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-04-15

Review 4.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

5.  Fecoflowmetric analysis of anorectal motor function in postoperative anal-preserving surgery patients with low rectal cancer comparison with the wexner score and anorectal manometry.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Ryu; Yoshito Akagi; Minoru Yagi; Teruo Sasatomi; Tetsushi Kinugasa; Keizo Yamaguchi; Yousuke Oka; Suguru Fukahori; Ichitaro Shiratsuchi; Takefumi Yoshida; Yukito Gotanda; Natsuki Tanaka; Takafumi Ohchi; Kansakar Romeo; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

6.  Differences in tissue degeneration between preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Nishizawa; Satoshi Fujii; Norio Saito; Masaaki Ito; Kentaro Nakajima; Atsushi Ochiai; Masanori Sugito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Yusuke Nishizawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Quor M Leong; Dong N Son; Jae S Cho; Se J Baek; Jung M Kwak; Azali H Amar; Seon H Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bladder-sparing extended resection of locally advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate and seminal vesicles.

Authors:  Norio Saito; Takanori Suzuki; Masanori Sugito; Masaaki Ito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Toshiyuki Tanaka; Masahito Kotaka; Hirokazu Karaki; Takaya Kobatake; Yoshiyuki Tsunoda; Akio Shiomi; Masaaki Yano; Nozomi Minagawa; Yuji Nishizawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Sphincter-sparing resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on postoperative fecal continence and anal sphincter function in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Alexander P Pietsch; Rainer Fietkau; Günther Klautke; Thomas Foitzik; Ernst Klar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.