Literature DB >> 14978095

Differential segmental flexibility and reach dictate the antigen binding mode of chimeric IgD and IgM: implications for the function of the B cell receptor.

Geir Å Løset1, Kenneth H Roux, Ping Zhu, Terje E Michaelsen, Inger Sandlie.   

Abstract

Mature, naive B cells coexpress IgD and IgM with identical binding sites. In this study, the binding properties of such IgM and IgD are compared to determine how size and shape may influence their ability to bind Ag and thus function as receptors. To dissect their intrinsic binding properties, recombinant IgM and IgD were produced in soluble form as monomers of the basic H(2)L(2) Ab architecture, each with two Ag binding sites. Since these sites are connected with a hinge region in IgD and structural Ig domains in IgM, the two molecules differ significantly in this region. The results show that IgD exhibited the larger angle and longer distance between its binding sites, as well as having the greater flexibility. Relative functional affinity was assessed on two antigenic surfaces with high or low epitope density, respectively. At high epitope density, IgM had a higher functional affinity for the Ag compared with IgD. The order was reversed at low epitope density due to a decrease in the functional affinity of IgM. Studies of binding kinetics showed similar association rates for both molecules. The dissociation rate, however, was slower for IgM at high epitope density and for IgD at low epitope density. Taken together, the results show that IgM and IgD with identical Ag binding regions have different Ag binding properties.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14978095     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  14 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of immunoglobulin D in mammals: immunoglobulin heavy constant delta genes in dogs, chimpanzees and four old world monkey species.

Authors:  Kenneth A Rogers; Jennifer P Richardson; Franco Scinicariello; Roberta Attanasio
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 2.  New insights into the enigma of immunoglobulin D.

Authors:  Kang Chen; Andrea Cerutti
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  The truth on IgD in the ploy of immune surveillance and inflammation.

Authors:  Donato Rigante
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 4.  The enigmatic function of IgD: some answers at last.

Authors:  Cindy Gutzeit; Kang Chen; Andrea Cerutti
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Anti-cooperativity in diffusion-controlled reactions with pairs of anisotropic domains: a model for the antigen-antibody encounter.

Authors:  F Piazza; P De Los Rios; D Fanelli; L Bongini; U Skoglund
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 6.  Self-reactivity on a spectrum: A sliding scale of peripheral B cell tolerance.

Authors:  Corey Tan; Mark Noviski; John Huizar; Julie Zikherman
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 7.  A conformation-induced oligomerization model for B cell receptor microclustering and signaling.

Authors:  Pavel Tolar; Susan K Pierce
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 8.  Control of autoreactive B cells by IgM and IgD B cell receptors: maintaining a fine balance.

Authors:  Mark Noviski; Julie Zikherman
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 7.486

9.  Affinity Selection in Germinal Centers: Cautionary Tales and New Opportunities.

Authors:  Jose Faro; Mario Castro
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  DeltaPhage--a novel helper phage for high-valence pIX phagemid display.

Authors:  Nicolay R Nilssen; Terje Frigstad; Sylvie Pollmann; Norbert Roos; Bjarne Bogen; Inger Sandlie; Geir Å Løset
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.