Literature DB >> 14977827

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of BMS-247550, a novel derivative of epothilone B, in solid tumors.

Sridhar Mani1, Hayley McDaid, Anne Hamilton, Howard Hochster, Marvin B Cohen, Dineo Khabelle, Tom Griffin, David E Lebwohl, Leonard Liebes, Franco Muggia, Susan Band Horwitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550 administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were premedicated and treated with escalating doses of BMS-247550. Blood sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated at six dose levels ranging from 7.4 to 59.2 mg/m(2). At 50 mg/m(2), 4 of 9 patients (44.4%) had dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia, abdominal pain/nausea). At 40 mg/m(2) (the recommended Phase II dose), 2 of 12 patients (16.7%) had dose-limiting neutropenia. Overall, the most common nonhematological toxicity was fatigue/generalized weakness (grade 3-4 seen in 9.0% of patients), followed by neurosensory deficits manifested as peripheral neuropathy and by gastrointestinal discomfort. At 40 mg/m(2), the incidence of grade 3 fatigue, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neuropathy was 7.7%. Grade 1-2 neuropathy was observed in all patients enrolled and treated at 40 mg/m(2). Two patients with paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer, one patient with taxane-naïve breast cancer, and another patient with docetaxel-refractory breast cancer had objective partial responses (lasting 6.0, 5.3, 3.0, and 4.5 months, respectively). The mean pharmacokinetic parameter values during course 1 for clearance, volume of distribution, and apparent terminal elimination half-life at the 40 mg/m(2) (recommended Phase II dose) dose level were 21 liters/h/m(2), 826 liters/m(2), and 35 h (excluding one outlier of 516 h), respectively. Values during course 1 and course 2 were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for Phase II evaluation of BMS-247550 is 40 mg/m(2), although more long-term observations are needed. BMS-247550 has advantages over taxanes in relation to drug resistance and warrants further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14977827     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-0919-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  34 in total

1.  A phase I/II trial and pharmacokinetic study of ixabepilone in adult patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  David M Peereboom; Jeffrey G Supko; Kathryn A Carson; Tracy Batchelor; Surasak Phuphanich; Glenn Lesser; Tom Mikkelsen; Tom Mikkelson; Joy Fisher; Serena Desideri; Xiaoying He; Stuart A Grossman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Phase I trial of ixabepilone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with adenocarcinoma of breast or ovary.

Authors:  E Chuang; N Wiener; P Christos; R Kessler; M Cobham; D Donovan; G L Goldberg; T Caputo; A Doyle; L Vahdat; J A Sparano
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Both microtubule-stabilizing and microtubule-destabilizing drugs inhibit hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha accumulation and activity by disrupting microtubule function.

Authors:  Daniel Escuin; Erik R Kline; Paraskevi Giannakakou
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  A Phase II evaluation of ixabepilone (IND #59699, NSC #710428) in the treatment of recurrent or persistent leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Linda R Duska; John A Blessing; Jacob Rotmensch; Robert S Mannel; Parviz Hanjani; Peter G Rose; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of ixabepilone administered daily for 5 days in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  Brigitte C Widemann; Wendy Goodspeed; Anne Goodwin; Tito Fojo; Frank M Balis; Elizabeth Fox
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Promising systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew M Cooney; Scot C Remick; Nicholas J Vogelzang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-09

Review 7.  Optimizing ixabepilone treatment schedules in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy Egerton
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Epothilones: tubulin polymerization as a novel target for prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  James J Lee; W Kevin Kelly
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-12-02

9.  Ixabepilone: a new chemotherapeutic option for refractory metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Adam Brufsky
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-09

10.  Novel microtubule-targeting agents - the epothilones.

Authors:  Kit L Cheng; Thomas Bradley; Daniel R Budman
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.