Literature DB >> 14977619

Performance on trials without knowledge results (KR) in reduced relative frequency presentations of KR.

W A Sparrow1, J J Summers.   

Abstract

Following Salmoni, Schmidt, & Walter's (1984) discussion of knowledge of results (KR) as a variable influencing learning, the effect of varying relative frequency of KR while holding absolute number of trials constant was examined. In two experiments, the same treatment groups were compared in acquisition, retention (after 2 min and 24 hr), and on their pattern of responses on the sequence of no-KR trials following a KR trial. In Experiment 1, differences between groups in acquisition were consistent with the number of KR trials received, and there were no differences between groups in either of the retention conditions. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 with a more difficult task. There were no between-group differences in acquisition. In Retention 1, the 100% and 33% relative frequency groups outperformed the less frequent KR groups, whereas in Retention 2, this trend was reversed. The findings from Experiment 2 provide qualified support for the hypothesis that reduced relative frequency of KR in acquisition facilitates performance in retention. The pattern of responses on the sequence of no-KR trials following a KR trial were consistent with Adams' (1971) perceptual-trace decay hypothesis.

Year:  1992        PMID: 14977619     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1992.9941615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  6 in total

Review 1.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback: Relative Frequency and Summary Feedback Effects on Performance and Retention of Reduced Vocal Intensity in the Daily Lives of Participants With Normal Voices.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Dagmar Sternad; Robert Petit; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Investigation of Feedback Schedules on Speech Motor Learning in Older Adults.

Authors:  Phil Weir-Mayta; Kristie A Spencer; Steven M Bierer; Ayoub Daliri; Peter Ondish; Ashley France; Erika Hutchison; Caitlin Sears
Journal:  Int J Aging Res       Date:  2019

4.  Integration of Motor Learning Principles Into Real-Time Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback and Example Implementation Via a Clinical Case Study With Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Frequent external-focus feedback enhances motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Suzete Chiviacowsky; Eduardo Schiller; Luciana Toaldo Gentilini Avila
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-11

6.  Gait training with real-time augmented toe-ground clearance information decreases tripping risk in older adults and a person with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Rezaul K Begg; Oren Tirosh; Catherine M Said; W A Sparrow; Nili Steinberg; Pazit Levinger; Mary P Galea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.