Literature DB >> 14977119

Predatory fauna in cornfields and response to imidacloprid seed treatment.

Ramon Albajes1, Carmen López, Xavier Pons.   

Abstract

The composition and abundance of predatory fauna in corn, Zea mays L., were studied by field visual sampling and pitfall traps over a 5-yr period. In visual samplings, the most abundant groups were Araneae, Heteroptera, Carabidae, Coccinellidae, and Staphylinidae, whereas the prevalent predators caught in pitfall traps belonged to Carabidae, Araneae, Dermaptera, and Opilionidae. The most abundant species or genera in the prevalent groups, except in Arachnida, were identified. Application of the insecticide imidacloprid as a seed dressing is common in the study area to prevent wireworm and cutworm damage. By comparing predator composition and abundance in treated and untreated cornfields during the 5 yr, we assessed the impact of imidacloprid seed treatment on predatory fauna. Among the prevalent predator groups found in visual sampling, Araneae, Coccinellidae, and Staphylinidae were not affected by the imidacloprid treatment, whereas Carabidae was only moderately affected in one of the 5 yr studied. On the contrary, Heteroptera was more drastically reduced by the imidacloprid, but the effect varied with the year. Incidence of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), may be increased as result of such heteropteran reduction. In pitfall traps, only Staphylinidae resulted in lower numbers as consequence of the treatment, whereas the rest of the most abundant predator groups, Carabidae, Araneae, Dermaptera, Opilionidae, Trombididae, and Heteroptera, were not caught in significantly different numbers in treated or untreated plots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14977119     DOI: 10.1093/jee/96.6.1805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  6 in total

1.  Occurrence and field densities of Coleoptera in the maize herb layer: implications for Environmental Risk Assessment of genetically modified Bt-maize.

Authors:  Stefan Rauschen; Frank Schaarschmidt; Achim Gathmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Lethal and sublethal effects of pesticides on Chrysoperla carnea larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and the influence of rainfastness in their degradation pattern over time.

Authors:  Jader Braga Maia; Geraldo Andrade Carvalho; Pilar Medina; Agustín Garzón; Pablo da Costa Gontijo; Elisa Viñuela
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Treating wheat seeds with neonicotinoid insecticides does not harm the rhizosphere microbial community.

Authors:  Yaofa Li; Jingjie An; Zhihong Dang; Haiying Lv; Wenliang Pan; Zhanlin Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Contact application of neonicotinoids suppresses the predation rate in different densities of prey and induces paralysis of common farmland spiders.

Authors:  Milan Řezáč; Veronika Řezáčová; Petr Heneberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.

Authors:  L W Pisa; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; C A Downs; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; M McField; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; J Settele; N Simon-Delso; J D Stark; J P Van der Sluijs; H Van Dyck; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Meta-analysis reveals that seed-applied neonicotinoids and pyrethroids have similar negative effects on abundance of arthropod natural enemies.

Authors:  Margaret R Douglas; John F Tooker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.