Literature DB >> 14977114

Acoustic estimation of infestations and population densities of white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in turfgrass.

Minling Zhang1, Robert L Crocker, Richard W Mankin, Kathy L Flanders, Jamee L Brandhorst-Hubbard.   

Abstract

Incidental sounds produced by Phyllophaga crinita (Burmeister) and Cyclocephala lurida (Bland) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) white grubs were monitored with single- and multiple-sensor acoustic detection systems in turf fields and golf course fairways in Texas. The maximum detection range of an individual acoustic sensor was measured in a greenhouse as approximately the area enclosed in a 26.5-cm-diameter perimeter (552 cm2). A single-sensor acoustic system was used to rate the likelihood of white grub infestation at monitored sites, and a four-sensor array was used to count the numbers of white grubs at sites where infestations were identified. White grub population densities were acoustically estimated by dividing the estimated numbers of white grubs by the area of the detection range. For comparisons with acoustic monitoring methods, infestations were assessed also by examining 10-cm-diameter soil cores collected with a standard golf cup-cutter. Both acoustic and cup-cutter assessments of infestation and estimates of white grub population densities were verified by excavation and sifting of the soil around the sensors after each site was monitored. The single-sensor acoustic method was more successful in assessing infestations at a recording site than was the cup-cutter method, possibly because the detection range was larger than the area of the soil core. White grubs were recovered from >90% of monitored sites rated at medium or high likelihood of infestation. Infestations were successfully identified at 23 of the 24 sites where white grubs were recovered at densities >50/m2, the threshold for economic damage. The four-sensor array yielded the most accurate estimates of the numbers of white grubs in the detection range, enabling reliable, nondestructive estimation of white grub population densities. However, tests with the array took longer and were more difficult to perform than tests with the single sensor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14977114     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-96.6.1770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Annotated catalog and bibliography of the cyclocephaline scarab beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae, Cyclocephalini).

Authors:  Matthew R Moore; Ronald D Cave; Marc A Branham
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  Temporal and spatial dynamics in soil acoustics and their relation to soil animal diversity.

Authors:  Marcus Maeder; Xianda Guo; Felix Neff; Doris Schneider Mathis; Martin M Gossner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics.

Authors:  Tiago A Marques; Len Thomas; Stephen W Martin; David K Mellinger; Jessica A Ward; David J Moretti; Danielle Harris; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2012-11-29

4.  Automated Applications of Acoustics for Stored Product Insect Detection, Monitoring, and Management.

Authors:  Richard Mankin; David Hagstrum; Min Guo; Panagiotis Eliopoulos; Anastasia Njoroge
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.