Literature DB >> 14975046

Should central venous catheters be used to drain pleural effusions?

Andrew MacDuff1, Ian S Grant.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14975046      PMCID: PMC420072          DOI: 10.1186/cc2447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
We read with interest the article by Singh and coworkers [1] describing the use of central venous catheters to drain pleural effusions. We agree that the use of small-bore catheters has a number of advantages compared with repeated thoracocentesis or the use of traditional large-bore drains inserted by blunt dissection. Indeed, recent guidelines [2] support the use of smaller bore tubes (8–14 Fr; except for haemothorax) in both pleural effusions and pneumothorax. However, we have reservations regarding the routine use of central venous catheters to drain pleural effusions. Several manufacturers (including the Sims-Portex Seldinger Chest Drainage Kit and Cook Quick-Thal Chest Tube) have specific chest drainage systems that take advantage of the Seldinger dilator over a wire method of insertion. These have the advantage of having a number of side ports (two to four), which reduces the possibility of blockage by debris, and they are available in a range of sizes (8–36 Fr). While we applaud innovation, in today's medico-legal climate it is surely wiser to use specifically designed equipment if it is available.
  2 in total

1.  BTS guidelines for the insertion of a chest drain.

Authors:  D Laws; E Neville; J Duffy
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Pleural drainage using central venous catheters.

Authors:  Kulgit Singh; Shi Loo; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.