Literature DB >> 1497440

Quantification of errors in laboratory reports. A quality improvement study of the College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes program.

P J Howanitz1, K Walker, P Bachner.   

Abstract

Over a 3-month period, 61,496 errors were detected in clinical laboratory reports by 631 participants in the College of American Pathologists' 1990 Q-Probes program. Each error detected was defined as an opportunity for improvement. Almost 4% of the detected errors were attributed to nonlaboratory personnel and approximately 4% (A errors) had a major impact on patient care. Rates of B (serious errors, but unlikely to affect patient care) and C errors (minor clerical errors) were approximately equal. When expressed in terms of measures of laboratory work loads, four of six measures of mean errors were lowest in blood banking, intermediate in chemistry and microbiology, and highest in hematology. Thirteen percent of participants did not have an error detection system in place. We conclude that many errors go undetected, and we recommend that an effective system for error detection in patient reports should be employed in all laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1497440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  3 in total

1.  Limitations of paperless on-line reporting of diagnostic bacteriology culture results.

Authors:  C Block; J Laloum; A Rajs; R Stalnikowicz; M Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  R C Bartlett; M Mazens-Sullivan; J Z Tetreault; S Lobel; J Nivard
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Quality standards and samples in genetic testing.

Authors:  David Ravine; Graeme Suthers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.