Literature DB >> 14973997

Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions.

P Shaw1, R Agarwal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all patients with metastatic cancer develop a malignant pleural effusion which is likely to lead to a significant reduction in quality of life secondary to symptoms such as dyspnoea and cough. The aim of pleurodesis in these patients is to prevent re-accumulation of the effusion and thereby of symptoms, and avoid the need for repeated hospitalization for thoracocentesis. Numerous clinical studies have been performed to try to determine the optimal pleurodesis strategy, and synthesis of the available evidence should facilitate this.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review were to ascertain the optimal technique of pleurodesis in cases of malignant pleural effusion; to confirm the need for a sclerosant; and to clarify which, if any, of the sclerosants is the most effective. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was searched for studies on 'pleurodesis'. Studies for inclusion were also identified from MEDLINE (1980 to June 2002) and EMBASE (1980 to May 2002). No language restriction was applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs of adults subjects undergoing pleurodesis for pleural effusion in the context of metastatic malignancy (or a malignant process leading to pleural effusion) were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion in the review, and extracted data using a standard data collection form. Primary outcome measures sought were effectiveness of pleurodesis as defined by freedom from recurrence of effusions, and mortality after pleurodesis. Secondary outcomes were adverse events due to pleurodesis. Dichotomous data were meta-analysed using a fixed effect model and expressed as relative risk. The number-needed-to-treat (NNT) was calculated for pleurodesis efficacy. In addition, for adverse events, the overall percentage of patients across studies exhibiting a particular adverse effect such as fever, pain, or gastrointestinal symptoms was calculated. MAIN
RESULTS: A total of 36 RCTs with 1499 subjects were eligible for meta-analysis. The use of sclerosants (mitozantrone, talc and tetracycline combined)compared with control (instillation of isotonic saline or equivalent pH isotonic saline or tube drainage alone) was associated with an increased efficacy of pleurodesis. The relative risk (RR) of non-recurrence of an effusion is 1.20 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.38) in favour of the use of sclerosants based on five studies with a total 228 subjects. Comparing different sclerosants, talc was found to be the most efficacious. The RR of effusion non-recurrence was 1.34 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.55) in favour of talc compared with bleomycin, tetracycline, mustine or tube drainage alone based on 10 studies comprising 308 subjects. This was not associated with increased mortality post pleurodesis. The RR of death was 1.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 1.77) for talc compared to bleomycin, tetracycline, mustine and tube drainage alone based on six studies of 186 subjects. Death was not reported in all studies and, when reported, was attributed to underlying disease, only one death being reported as procedure-related. In the comparison of thoracoscopic versus medical pleurodesis, thoracoscopic pleurodesis was found to be more effective. The RR of non-recurrence of effusion is 1.19 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.36) in favour of thoracoscopic pleurodesis compared with tube thoracostamy pleurodesis utilizing talc as sclerosant based on two studies with 112 subjects. Comparing thoracoscopic versus bedside instillation (with different sized chest tubes) of various sclerosants (tetracycline, bleomycin, talc or mustine) the RR of non-recurrence of effusion is 1.68 (95% CI 1.35 to 2.10) based on five studies with a total of 145 participants.Adverse events were not reported adequately to enable meta-analysis. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence supports the need for chemical sclerosants for successful pleurodesis, the use of talc as the sclerosant of choice, and thoracoscopic pleurodesis as the preferred technique for pleurodesis based on efficacy. There was no evidence for an increase in mortality following talc pleurodesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14973997     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002916.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  78 in total

1.  Hepatic breast cancer dissemination after an iatrogenic hepatic laceration during talc pleurodesis: a case report.

Authors:  Joaquim Bosch-Barrera; Jaime Espinós
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-05-06

Review 2.  Switching off malignant pleural effusion formation-fantasy or future?

Authors:  Magda Spella; Anastasios D Giannou; Georgios T Stathopoulos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Seeking consensus by formal methods: a health warning.

Authors:  Carol Tan; Tom Treasure; John Browne; Martin Utley; Christopher W H Davies; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Simple technique of talc delivery for video-assisted talc pleurodesis.

Authors:  Rajwinder S Jutley; Salman Waqar; Neil Raha; Paul Fenton; Pradip K Sarkar
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-02-12

5.  Efficacy and safety of Viscum album extract (Helixor-M) to treat malignant pleural effusion in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Gyoo Lee; Ina Jung; Dong-Hoe Koo; Du-Young Kang; Tae Yoon Oh; Sukjoong Oh; Seung-Sei Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Minimally invasive palliative interventions in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Christopher Mallow; Margaret Hayes; Roy Semaan; Thomas Smith; Russell Hales; Roy Brower; Lonny Yarmus
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions: state of the art in 2017.

Authors:  Neeraj R Desai; Hans J Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Treatment of malignant pleural effusion: PleuRx catheter or talc pleurodesis? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Aaron M Olden; Robert Holloway
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 9.  Perineal talc use and ovarian cancer: a critical review.

Authors:  Joshua E Muscat; Michael S Huncharek
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 10.  Pleural controversies: indwelling pleural catheter vs. pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions.

Authors:  Marc Fortin; Alain Tremblay
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.