Literature DB >> 14972717

Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology--a cross-sectional study.

Sin-Wan Cheung1, Pauline Cho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine which clinical tests are useful in orthokeratology aftercare examination, and to examine the objective and subjective characteristics of a group of orthokeratology lens wearers.
METHODS: Thirty orthokeratology subjects (8-19 years) who had been wearing orthokeratology lenses for over 12 months were recruited. Autorefraction, corneal topography, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and biomicroscopy were performed. Only left eyes results were analysed. Subjective ratings of symptoms and problems experienced by subjects were obtained using a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Autorefraction yielded higher residual sphere and residual cylinder by -0.54 D and -0.39 D respectively while retinoscopy yielded higher residual sphere and residual cylinder by -0.20 D and -0.03 D respectively. Corneal toricity measured by autokeratometry and corneal topography overpredicted the residual cylinder by -2.02 D and -2.08 D respectively. The mean +/- SD residual spherical equivalent refractive error was -0.11 +/- 0.57 D and the mean +/- SD unaided postorthokeratology visual acuity was 0.08 +/- 0.14 logMAR. The unaided visual acuity was significantly related to the residual cylinder. Pigmented arc was present in 16 corneas (53%). The most common problems/symptoms experienced by the subjects were lens binding (73%), ocular discharge in the morning (69%) and blur distance vision (47%). Over 80% of the subjects found lens handling troublesome in varying degree. All, except two subjects (who disliked the lens handling), wanted to continue the treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: History taking, subjective refraction, biomicroscopy and corneal topography are important in a routine orthokeratology aftercare examination. Corneal pigmented arc, ocular discharge in the morning and lens binding were the most common sign, symptom and problem respectively observed/ reported. Most orthokeratology lens wearers with low to moderate myopia and low astigmatism enjoyed reasonably good unaided post-orthokeratology vision in the daytime.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14972717     DOI: 10.1076/ceyr.28.2.121.26236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  4 in total

1.  Peripheral Refraction With Toric Orthokeratology and Soft Toric Multifocal Contact Lenses in Myopic Astigmatic Eyes.

Authors:  Erin S Tomiyama; David A Berntsen; Kathryn Richdale
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.925

Review 2.  Orthokeratology: clinical utility and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Jessie Charm
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2017-02-07

3.  Current State and Future Trends: A Citation Network Analysis of the Orthokeratology Field.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Sanchez-Tena; Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Jose Sanchez-Valverde; Cesar Villa-Collar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Assessment of Satisfaction, Compliance and Side Effects among Long-Term Orthokeratology Wearers.

Authors:  Shang-Yen Wu; Jen-Hung Wang; Cheng-Jen Chiu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.