Literature DB >> 14972691

Global-local visual biases correspond with visual-spatial orientation.

Michael R Basso1, Natasha Lowery.   

Abstract

Within the past decade, numerous investigations have demonstrated reliable associations of global-local visual processing biases with right and left hemisphere function, respectively (cf. Van Kleeck, 1989). Yet the relevance of these biases to other cognitive functions is not well understood. Towards this end, the present research examined the relationship between global-local visual biases and perception of visual-spatial orientation. Twenty-six women and 23 men completed a global-local judgment task (Kimchi and Palmer, 1982) and the Judgment of Line Orientation Test (JLO; Benton, Sivan, Hamsher, Varney, and Spreen, 1994), a measure of visual-spatial orientation. As expected, men had better performance on JLO. Extending previous findings, global biases were related to better visual-spatial acuity on JLO. The findings suggest that global-local biases and visual-spatial orientation may share underlying cerebral mechanisms. Implications of these findings for other visually mediated cognitive outcomes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14972691     DOI: 10.1076/jcen.26.1.24.23939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  11 in total

1.  Schizophrenia patients show deficits in shifts of attention to different levels of global-local stimuli: evidence for magnocellular dysfunction.

Authors:  Michael J Coleman; Laurie Cestnick; Olga Krastoshevsky; Verena Krause; Zhuying Huang; Nancy R Mendell; Deborah L Levy
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  The gist and details of sex differences in cognition and the brain: How parallels in sex differences across domains are shaped by the locus coeruleus and catecholamine systems.

Authors:  Alexandra Ycaza Herrera; Jiaxi Wang; Mara Mather
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Sex-specific strategy use and global-local processing: a perspective toward integrating sex differences in cognition.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Changes in cortical thickness in 6-year-old children open their mind to a global vision of the world.

Authors:  Nicolas Poirel; Elise Leroux; Arlette Pineau; Olivier Houdé; Grégory Simon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Sex differences and functional hemispheric asymmetries during number comparison.

Authors:  TiAnni Harris; Andrea Scheuringer; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 8.811

6.  Sex Differences in Number Magnitude Processing Strategies Are Mediated by Spatial Navigation Strategies: Evidence From the Unit-Decade Compatibility Effect.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; TiAnni Harris; Andrea Scheuringer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-12

7.  Sex hormones and number processing. Progesterone and testosterone relate to hemispheric asymmetries during number comparison.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; Selina Jäger; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Different Dimensions of Cognitive Style in Typical and Atypical Cognition: New Evidence and a New Measurement Tool.

Authors:  Andy D Mealor; Julia Simner; Nicolas Rothen; Duncan A Carmichael; Jamie Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sex differences in the Kimchi-Palmer task revisited: Global reaction times, but not number of global choices differ between adult men and women.

Authors:  Andrea Scheuringer; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-07-18

10.  Eye-movements during number comparison: Associations to sex and sex hormones.

Authors:  Larissa Schulte; Stefan Hawelka; Belinda Angela Pletzer
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.