Literature DB >> 14972492

Ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: comparison of minimally invasive extravesical with transvesical and conventional extravesical techniques.

Hsiao-Wen Chen1, Shyng-Shiou F Yuan, Chi-Jen Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze and compare the different ureteral reimplantation techniques to clarify the decision making for surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.
METHODS: From July 1995 to December 2000, 218 patients underwent antireflux surgery. The first 92 cases (143 ureters) were performed with the transvesical technique of Cohen (group 1), the next 37 cases (49 ureters) with the conventional extravesical technique (group 2), and the last 89 cases (113 ureters) with the new minimally invasive technique (group 3). The surgical time, length of hospital stay, postoperative side effects, frequency of pain control, and voiding cystogram findings to ensure the cessation of reflux for all patients were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: The success rates were similar among the different procedures. All patients in group 1 required a suprapubic cystostomy, and three had blood clot retention. Four patients in group 2 had bladder inefficiency. The surgical time ranged from 139 to 181 minutes in group 1, 58 to 94 minutes in group 2, and 40 to 61 minutes in group 3. The length of hospital stay ranged from 2.8 to 5.5 days in groups 1 and 2, and no hospital stay was needed in group 3. The frequency of analgesic administration was significantly less in group 2 compared with group 1; however, no analgesia was required in group 3.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from our comparison show that the minimally invasive technique can be used as a simple and highly effective interventional procedure with less morbidity for the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14972492     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  [Long-term experience with Cohen ureteral reimplantation in bilateral vesicoureteral reflux in childhood].

Authors:  F Seseke; A Strauss; S Seseke; H Zappel; R H Ringert; G Zöller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Prolonged urinary retention can and does occur after any type of ureteral reimplantantion.

Authors:  Martin A Koyle; Hissan Butt; Armando Lorenzo; Gerald C Mingin; Jack S Elder; Grahame H H Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (revur) for unilateral vesico-ureteral reflux in children: results of a multicentric international survey.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Lorenzo Masieri; Henri Steyaert; Maria Escolino; Raffaele Cerchione; Angela La Manna; Chiara Cini; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The retroperitoneal, inguinal approach to distal part of the ureter.

Authors:  Wiesław Urbanowicz; Ireneusz Honkisz; Janusz Sulisławski; Barbara Dobrowolska-Glazar
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-04-17

5.  Laparoscopy and pediatric urology.

Authors:  Wojciech Apoznański; Andrzej Jankowski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014

6.  Extravesical (modified Gregoir Lich) versus intravesical (Cohen's) ureteric reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux in children: A single center experience.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Sriram; Ramesh Babu
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Michael Yap; Unwanabong Nseyo; Hena Din; Madhu Alagiri
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.