Literature DB >> 14972485

Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.

John Varkarakis1, Germar-Michael Pinggera, Philippe Sebe, Andreas Berger, Georg Bartsch, Wolfgang Horninger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and outcome of prostate cancer in men younger than 45 years of age treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy after screening in an early prostate cancer detection program.
METHODS: Our study group comprised 19,302 men younger than 45 years old who participated in this program. The indications for prostate biopsy were a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 1.25 ng/mL or greater and a percent-free PSA value of 18% or less. Patients with prostate cancer underwent nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications, clinical and pathologic stage, Gleason score, and surgical margins were reviewed retrospectively. In addition, potency, continence, and biochemical recurrence were assessed at the last follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Of the study population eligible for prostate biopsy (1027 patients), only 175 (17%) consented to undergo the procedure (mean PSA 3.8 ng/mL). Twenty-eight men were diagnosed with prostate cancer, corresponding to 0.14% of the screened population and 16% of the biopsied patients. Twenty-six patients agreed to undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. Pathologic examination revealed organ-confined disease in 22 (84.6%) and extraprostatic extension in 4 (15.4%). Positive surgical margins were seen in 2 patients (7.7%). The Gleason score was 7 or greater in 11 (42.3%) and 6 or less in 15 patients (57.7%). During a mean follow-up period of 15.8 months (range 3 to 36), all patients were continent, and 13 of the 16 patients with a follow-up of 12 months or longer were potent.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large screening population younger than 45 years old, 16% of biopsied patients were positive for prostate cancer. These tumors were clinically significant but of a low stage and therefore potentially curable by surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14972485     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Can erectile function be predicted after prostate cancer treatment?

Authors:  Frances M Alba; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Risk stratification of prostate cancer patients based on EPS-urine zinc content.

Authors:  Zdravka Medarova; Subrata K Ghosh; Mark Vangel; Richard Drake; Anna Moore
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Are the Pathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer More Aggressive or More Indolent Depending upon the Patient Age?

Authors:  Guangjie Ji; Cong Huang; Gang Song; Gengyan Xiong; Dong Fang; He Wang; Han Hao; Lin Cai; Qun He; Zhisong He; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.