Literature DB >> 14970929

When genes go to sleep: the population genetic consequences of seed dormancy and monocarpic perenniality.

Renaud Vitalis1, Sylvain Glémin, Isabelle Olivieri.   

Abstract

In many annual plant populations, seeds may be dormant for several seasons before they germinate. Here, we investigate the consequences of both conditional (dispersed seeds cannot enter a dormant stage) and unconditional seed dormancy on the amount and the distribution of neutral genetic diversity within and among populations. We present joint demographic and population genetics models for single and subdivided populations and derive the effective size and population differentiation at both local and metapopulation scales. We suggest that a Wahlund effect is unlikely to result from age structure alone. Furthermore, the differentiation among populations is decreased by the presence of seed banks. We also extend these models to describe monocarpic (semelparous) perennial life cycle, where the nonreproductive stages are vegetative rosettes instead of dormant seeds. The main difference between the models relies in the way the density-dependent regulation is acting. The effective size of monocarpic perennial species may be less than the census number of individuals, and among-population differentiation is always larger than in annual species. We discuss our results in the light of recent population genetics surveys of annual plants with seed banks.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14970929     DOI: 10.1086/381041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  22 in total

1.  Effective size of a fluctuating age-structured population.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; Russell Lande; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The influence of contemporary and historic landscape features on the genetic structure of the sand dune endemic, Cirsium pitcheri (Asteraceae).

Authors:  J B Fant; K Havens; J M Keller; A Radosavljevic; E D Yates
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Beyond lifetime reproductive success: the posthumous reproductive dynamics of male Trinidadian guppies.

Authors:  Andrés López-Sepulcre; Swanne P Gordon; Ian G Paterson; Paul Bentzen; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Simple life-history traits explain key effective population size ratios across diverse taxa.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Gordon Luikart; James R Faulkner; David A Tallmon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Is the post-disturbance composition of a plant population determined by selection for outcrossed seedlings or by the composition of the seedbank?

Authors:  D G Roberts; K M Ottewell; R J Whelan; D J Ayre
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Genetic Variability Under the Seedbank Coalescent.

Authors:  Jochen Blath; Adrián González Casanova; Bjarki Eldon; Noemi Kurt; Maite Wilke-Berenguer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The anchoring effect-long-term dormancy and genetic population structure.

Authors:  Lisa Sundqvist; Anna Godhe; Per R Jonsson; Josefin Sefbom
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Inference of seed bank parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data.

Authors:  Aurélien Tellier; Stefan J Y Laurent; Hilde Lainer; Pavlos Pavlidis; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Metapopulation structure and fine-scaled genetic structuring in crop-wild hybrid weed beets.

Authors:  J-F Arnaud; J Cuguen; S Fénart
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Pollen dispersal and gene flow within and into a population of the alpine monocarpic plant Campanula thyrsoides.

Authors:  J F Scheepens; Eva S Frei; Georg F J Armbruster; Jürg Stöcklin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.