| Literature DB >> 14970852 |
M Lotem1, E Shiloni, I Pappo, O Drize, T Hamburger, R Weitzen, R Isacson, L Kaduri, S Merims, S Frankenburg, T Peretz.
Abstract
This paper is a report of response rate (RR) and survival of 34 metastatic melanoma patients who received a dinitrophenyl (DNP)-modified autologous melanoma cell vaccine. In all, 27 patients started the vaccine as a primary treatment for metastatic melanoma and seven started it as an adjuvant, with no evidence of disease at the time, but had developed new metastases. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was administered in 24 out of the 34 patients: 19 who progressed on vaccine alone and five who had the combination from start. Interleukin-2 was administered in the intravenous, bolus high-dose regimen (seven patients) or as subcutaneous (s.c.) low-dose treatment (17). Overall response for the entire group was 35% (12 patients out of 34), 12% having a complete response (CR) and 23% a partial response (PR). However, only two patients had tumour responses while on the vaccine alone, whereas the other 10 demonstrated objective tumour regression following the combination with IL-2 (two CR, eight PR), lasting for a median duration of 6 months (range 3-50 months). Of the 12 responding patients, 11 attained strong skin reactivity to the s.c. injection of irradiated, unmodified autologous melanoma cells. None of the patients with a negative reactivity experienced any tumour response. Patients with positive skin reactions survived longer (median survival - 54 months). The results suggest enhanced RRs to the combination of IL-2 and autologous melanoma vaccine. Skin reactivity to unmodified autologous melanoma cells may be a predictor of response and improved survival, and therefore a criterion for further pursuing of immunotherapeutic strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 14970852 PMCID: PMC2410164 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patients' characteristics
| Men | 20 |
| Women | 14 |
| Median | 48.5 |
| Range | 11−75 |
| III | 13 |
| IV | 21 |
| Skin and s.c. alone | 10 |
| LNs±Skin and s.c. | 8 |
| Visceral | 16 |
| Lung | 9 |
| Liver | 6 |
| Bone | 2 |
| Ovary | 1 |
| Adrenal | 1 |
| Patients with more than one site | 10 |
| ILP | 10 |
| Chemotherapy | 14 |
| Irradiation | 14 |
| IFN | 3 |
s.c.=subcutaneous; LN=lymph node; ILP=isolated limb perfusion; IFNα=interferon alpha.
Including multiple visceral sites or visceral organ with s.c. or LN metastases.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier survival curve as a function of DTH response to unmodified autologous tumour cells. Data available from 32 patients. DTH test was not performed for two patients with a rapidly progressing disease.
Clinical data of patients achieving objective responses
| 1 | F | 69 | Surgery, ILP, DTIC+cDDP, XRT | Metastatic | No IL-2 | Skin, leg and thigh | CR | Skin, leg and thigh | 42+ | |
| 2 | F | 75 | Surgery, ILP, XRT | Metastatic | No IL-2 | Skin, leg | CR | Skin, leg | 32+ | |
| 3 | F | 71 | Surgery, DTIC, XRT | Adjuvant | Low dose | 12 mo | Pelvic adenopathy | PR | Pelvic adenopathy(Figure 3) | 10 |
| 4 | M | 58 | Surgery, ILP, XRT | Metastatic | Low dose | Concurrent | Skin, leg; inguinal LN | PR | Skin, inguinal LN(Figure 4) | 15+ |
| 5 | F | 55 | Surgery, DTIC+cDDP+low-dose IL-2+GM-CSF, XRT | Metastatic | Low dose | Concurrent | Brain resected; paravertebral mass; lung | PR | Lung, paravertebralmass | 3 |
| 6 | F | 44 | Surgery, adjuvant IHA fotemustine, radiofrequency ablation | Adjuvant | Low dose | 24 mo | Liver | PR | Liver | 6 |
| 7 | M | 57 | Surgery | Metastatic | Low dose+inhalation | Concurent | Lung, mediastinal LN | PR | Lung | 3 |
| 8 | M | 68 | Surgery | Adjuvant | Low dose+inhalation | 12 mo | Lung | PR | Lung(Figure 5) | 4+ |
| 9 | F | 55 | Surgery, single dose of BCG | Metastatic | Low dose+inhalation | Concurrent | Skin, thigh resected; seven bilateral lung mets | CR | Lung | 14 |
| 10 | M | 52 | Surgery, chemotherapy (cDDP+DTIC, fotemustine), pelvic perfusion with cDDP | Metastatic | High dose | 20 mo | Skin, lower extremity; pelvic LNs | PR | Skin, lower extremity; pelvic LNs | 11 |
| 11 | F | 28 | Surgery, LD IFN, ILP with melphalan | Metastatic | High dose | After eight vaccinations | Skin, lower extremity; pelvic LNs | CR | Skin | 50+ |
| 12 | F | 54 | Surgery | Metastatic | Low dose and later high dose | Concurrent | Skin, lower extremity; lung | PR | Lung | 3 |
cDDP=cisplatinum; XRT=radiotherapy; IHA=intrahepatic artery infusion; HD=high dose; LD=low dose; IL-2=Interleukin-2; ILP=isolated limb perfusion; GM-CSF=granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFN=interferon; mo=months; LN=lymph node, CR=complete response; PR=partial response.
Based on CT report of another medical center; DTIC=dacarbazine.
Figure 3(A) Pelvic CT prior to initiation of low-dose IL-2, in a patient who received adjuvant autologous melanoma vaccine, and had recurrent pelvic LN metastases 12 months later (patient 3). (B) Partial regression of pelvic lymph nodes after 6 months of therapy.
Figure 4(A) Regressing dermal metastases with perilesional vitiligo in patient 4. (B) Melanin-laden melanophages in upper dermis, in a skin biopsy from a regressing lesion of patient 4 (H&E × 20). (C) White hair arising from regressed s.c. metastases. Hair of noninvolved skin is fully melanised (patient 11).
Figure 5Patient 9: CT of the thorax. (A and B). Three metastatic deposits <1 cm. (C and D). At 3 months after initiation of autologous melanoma vaccine with low dose and inhalations of IL-2–significant partial regression of all lesions. Patient has eventually achieved CR.
Response rates
| Total (34 patients) | 4 | 11.8 | 8 | 23.5 | 5 | 14.7 | 17 | 50.0 |
| Vaccine only | 2 | 9.1 | 0 | — | 1 | 4.5 | 19 | 86.4 |
| Vaccine+IL-2 | 2 | 9.1 | 8 | 36.4 | 2 | 9.1 | 10 | 45.5 |
| Low dose (17 patients) | 1 | 5.9 | 6 | 35.3 | 2 | 11.8 | 8 | 47.0 |
| High dose (seven patients) | 1 | 20.0 | 2 | 40.0 | 0 | — | 2 | 40.0 |
The effect of vaccine treatment alone, before adding IL-2. CR=complete response; PR=partial response; IL-2=Interleukin-2.