Literature DB >> 14970810

Reliability of the motor evoked potentials elicited through magnetic stimulation at three sites.

Richard Lefebvre1, André Pépin, Pierre-Félix Louis, Jean P Boucher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained from magnetic stimulation allow the measurement of the excitability of motor nerve cells. Although this technique is becoming widely used, its reliability has yet to be established.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of MEPs and evaluate their stability.
DESIGN: Subjects received magnetic stimulation at 3 different sites: cranial, cervical, and peripheral. Three stimulations were given at each site. Stimulations were given under 4 conditions: eyes open or closed and with or without controlled mental activity.
SETTING: The study was performed in a research laboratory setting. PARTICIPANTS: Nine healthy subjects (mean age = 21 years +/- 0.9), asymptomatic of any neural or musculoskeletal dysfunctions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Normalized peak-to-peak amplitude of MEPs at the opponens pollicis muscle.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlations were high for all conditions (R > 0.90). The amplitude of the MEPs elicited from the transcranial site during the controlled mental activity condition was increased by 26.6% (P =.017). No other significant differences (P >.05) were obtained among the other conditions.
CONCLUSION: Intraclass correlation results reveal that MEP measurements are highly reliable in a controlled environment. The increase of MEPs during the controlled mental activity condition could be attributed to an elevation of neural activity of different nonmotor areas of the brain increasing corticospinal excitability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14970810     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  6 in total

1.  The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Scott C Livingston; Howard P Goodkin; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation and pain.

Authors:  Allyson C Rosen; Mukund Ramkumar; Tam Nguyen; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-02

3.  Increased variability of motor cortical excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: a new clue to an old enigma.

Authors:  Adriana B Conforto; Mariana S Moraes; Edson Amaro; William B Young; Lais A Lois; André L Gonçalves; Mario F P Peres
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 7.277

4.  Interhemispheric Inhibition Measurement Reliability in Stroke: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Haitao Chu; Mo Chen; Teresa J Kimberley; James R Carey
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-06-22

5.  A higher number of TMS-elicited MEP from a combined hotspot improves intra- and inter-session reliability of the upper limb muscles in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Andisheh Bastani; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Can the Recording of Motor Potentials Evoked by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Be Optimized?

Authors:  Marco A C Garcia; Victor H Souza; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.