Literature DB >> 14970707

FISH analysis comparing genome organization in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) to that of the Mongolian wild horse (E. przewalskii).

J L Myka1, T L Lear, M L Houck, O A Ryder, E Bailey.   

Abstract

Przewalski's wild horse (E. przewalskii, EPR) has a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 66 while the domestic horse (E. caballus, ECA) has a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 64. Discussions about their phylogenetic relationship and taxonomic classification have hinged on comparisons of their skeletal morphology, protein and mitochondrial DNA similarities, their ability to produce fertile hybrid offspring, and on comparison of their chromosome morphology and banding patterns. Previous studies of GTG-banded karyotypes suggested that the chromosomes of both equids were homologous and the difference in chromosome number was due to a Robertsonian event involving two pairs of acrocentric chromosomes in EPR and one pair of metacentric chromosomes in ECA (ECA5). To determine which EPR chromosomes were homologous to ECA5 and to confirm the predicted chromosome homologies based on GTG banding, we constructed a comparative gene map between ECA and EPR by FISH mapping 46 domestic horse-derived BAC clones containing genes previously mapped to ECA chromosomes. The results indicated that all ECA and EPR chromosomes were homologous as predicted by GTG banding, but provide new information in that the EPR acrocentric chromosomes EPR23 and EPR24 were shown to be homologues of the ECA metacentric chromosome ECA5. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14970707     DOI: 10.1159/000075753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  5 in total

1.  A high-resolution physical map of equine homologs of HSA19 shows divergent evolution compared with other mammals.

Authors:  Candice Brinkmeyer-Langford; Terje Raudsepp; Eun-Joon Lee; Glenda Goh; Alejandro A Schäffer; Richa Agarwala; Michelle L Wagner; Teruaki Tozaki; Loren C Skow; James E Womack; James R Mickelson; Bhanu P Chowdhary
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Subchromosomal karyotype evolution in Equidae.

Authors:  P Musilova; S Kubickova; J Vahala; J Rubes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  The horse genome derby: racing from map to whole genome sequence.

Authors:  Bhanu P Chowdhary; Terje Raudsepp
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  A massively parallel sequencing approach uncovers ancient origins and high genetic variability of endangered Przewalski's horses.

Authors:  Hiroki Goto; Oliver A Ryder; Allison R Fisher; Bryant Schultz; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Anton Nekrutenko; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Analysis of horse genomes provides insight into the diversification and adaptive evolution of karyotype.

Authors:  Jinlong Huang; Yiping Zhao; Wunierfu Shiraigol; Bei Li; Dongyi Bai; Weixing Ye; Dorjsuren Daidiikhuu; Lihua Yang; Burenqiqige Jin; Qinan Zhao; Yahan Gao; Jing Wu; Wuyundalai Bao; Anaer Li; Yuhong Zhang; Haige Han; Haitang Bai; Yanqing Bao; Lele Zhao; Zhengxiao Zhai; Wenjing Zhao; Zikui Sun; Yan Zhang; He Meng; Manglai Dugarjaviin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.