Literature DB >> 14969493

Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities.

William A Link1.   

Abstract

Heterogeneity in detection probabilities has long been recognized as problematic in mark-recapture studies, and numerous models developed to accommodate its effects. Individual heterogeneity is especially problematic, in that reasonable alternative models may predict essentially identical observations from populations of substantially different sizes. Thus even with very large samples, the analyst will not be able to distinguish among reasonable models of heterogeneity, even though these yield quite distinct inferences about population size. The problem is illustrated with models for closed and open populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14969493     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

1.  Modeling genome coverage in single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Timothy Daley; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Predicting discovery rates of genomic features.

Authors:  Simon Gravel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Novel bioinformatics quality control metric for next-generation sequencing experiments in the clinical context.

Authors:  Maxim Ivanov; Mikhail Ivanov; Artem Kasianov; Ekaterina Rozhavskaya; Sergey Musienko; Ancha Baranova; Vladislav Mileyko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Comparative performance of multiple-list estimators of key population size.

Authors:  Steve Gutreuter
Journal:  PLOS Glob Public Health       Date:  2022-03-10

5.  Solomon Islands largest hawksbill turtle rookery shows signs of recovery after 150 years of excessive exploitation.

Authors:  Richard J Hamilton; Tomas Bird; Collin Gereniu; John Pita; Peter C Ramohia; Richard Walter; Clara Goerlich; Colin Limpus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Recapture heterogeneity in cliff swallows: increased exposure to mist nets leads to net avoidance.

Authors:  Erin A Roche; Charles R Brown; Mary Bomberger Brown; Kristen M Lear
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics.

Authors:  Tiago A Marques; Len Thomas; Stephen W Martin; David K Mellinger; Jessica A Ward; David J Moretti; Danielle Harris; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2012-11-29

8.  Estimating the number of injection drug users in greater Victoria, Canada using capture-recapture methods.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Murray Fyfe; Liz Walker; Laura L E Cowen
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2014-03-03

9.  Estimation of capture probabilities using generalized estimating equations and mixed effects approaches.

Authors:  Md Abdus Salam Akanda; Russell Alpizar-Jara
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Reliability of different mark-recapture methods for population size estimation tested against reference population sizes constructed from field data.

Authors:  Annegret Grimm; Bernd Gruber; Klaus Henle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.