Literature DB >> 14969403

Relationship between pretreatment bone resorption and vertebral fracture incidence in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with risedronate.

Markus J Seibel1, Vasi Naganathan, Ian Barton, Andreas Grauer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: It is unclear whether the antifracture efficacy of bisphosphonates depends on pretreatment bone turnover. We analyzed the risedronate phase III clinical programs using the urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (uDPD) as an index of pretreatment bone resorption rates. Risedronate reduced incident vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis independent from pretreatment bone resorption.
INTRODUCTION: Earlier studies on postmenopausal osteoporosis have suggested that the therapeutic efficacy of antiresorptive therapies might be influenced by pretreatment bone turnover. Because all of these studies have used bone mineral density (BMD) as the primary endpoint, it remains unclear whether this association holds true for incident fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study aims to answer this question in a post hoc analysis of a subset of the risedronate phase III clinical programs, using the urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (uDPD) as an index of pretreatment bone resorption (PBR). A total of 1593 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis that had baseline uDPD values and paired spinal radiographs available were pooled, in similar proportions, from the risedronate multinational and North American VERT, and from the risedronate HIP trials. Patients from treatment and placebo groups were stratified by the uDPD premenopausal normative median. The four resulting groups were balanced for age, years since menopause, body mass index, baseline femoral neck BMD, and number of prevalent fractures, but baseline lumbar spine BMD was significantly higher in patients with low PBR rates.
RESULTS: In all groups, the proportion of patients with new vertebral fractures was higher in patients with baseline uDPD levels above the normative median. The incidence of vertebral fracture was significantly lower in groups assigned to risedronate compared with placebo. This effect was independent of PBR: in patients with high PBR, the relative risk (RR) of vertebral fracture after 1 year of risedronate was 0.28 (p = 0.03 compared with controls, absolute risk reduction 7.1%). In patients with low PBR, the RR of fracture after 1 year was 0.33 (p < 0.001, absolute risk reduction 4%). After 3 years, the RR of fracture was 0.52 (p = 0.042, absolute risk reduction 8.3%) in patients with high PBR, and 0.54 (p = 0.002, absolute risk reduction 7.1%) in patients with low PBR. Results were similar after adjusting for age, baseline lumbar spine BMD, and prevalent fractures. The number needed to treat to avoid one vertebral fracture at 12 months was 15 in the group of patients with high PBR and 25 in patients with low PBR. Risedronate significantly increased lumbar spine BMD. During the first year of treatment, women with high PBR gained lumbar spine BMD at a faster rate than patients with low PBR. Treatment-by-PBR status interactions were not significantly different over time.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of risedronate to reduce incident vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is largely independent of pretreatment bone resorption rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14969403     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.0301231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  27 in total

1.  Urinary pentosidine and plasma homocysteine levels at baseline predict future fractures in osteoporosis patients under bisphosphonate treatment.

Authors:  Masataka Shiraki; Tatsuhiko Kuroda; Yumiko Shiraki; Shiro Tanaka; Tsuyoshi Higuchi; Mitsuru Saito
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Successes achieved and challenges ahead in translating biomarkers into clinical applications.

Authors:  Greg Tesch; Shashi Amur; John T Schousboe; Jeffrey N Siegel; Lawrence J Lesko; Jane P F Bai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  The role of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis management in clinical practice.

Authors:  Samuel D Vasikaran; Paul Glendenning; Howard A Morris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-08

Review 4.  Bone markers in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  The Utility of Biomarkers in Osteoporosis Management.

Authors:  Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 6.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover and clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Fred Saad; James A Eastham; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 7.  The management of osteoporosis in children.

Authors:  L M Ward; V N Konji; J Ma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Factors associated with bisphosphonate treatment failure in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Cairoli; C Eller-Vainicher; F M Ulivieri; V V Zhukouskaya; S Palmieri; V Morelli; P Beck-Peccoz; I Chiodini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Evidence-based guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the selection and monitoring of bisphosphonate treatment in osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  P Bergmann; J-J Body; S Boonen; Y Boutsen; J-P Devogelaer; S Goemaere; J-M Kaufman; J-Y Reginster; V Gangji
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate according to pre-treatment bone turnover.

Authors:  J Collette; O Bruyère; J M Kaufman; R Lorenc; D Felsenberg; T D Spector; M Diaz-Curiel; S Boonen; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.