Literature DB >> 14969176

Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity.

Michael A Sass1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the direct-to-vial efficacy of the SurePath Pap test (TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in a community hospital laboratory and to assess its impact on productivity, as measured by Pap test turnaround times (TATs). STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 8,771 SurePath Pap tests were compared to 5,055 conventional Pap smears collected and processed over the same 12-month period. SurePath histologic correlation rates were compared to historical correlation rates for conventional Pap smears. Pap test TATs for 3 months prior to implementing SurePath were compared to TATs for the last 3 months of the study, which included an approximate 70:30 ratio of SurePath to conventional Pap tests. Laboratory staffing was unchanged, and mean monthly accessions were relatively constant.
RESULTS: SurePath showed statistically significant improvements in the detection of low grade (LSIL) (196%) and high grade (HSIL) (243%) squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) relative to conventional Pap smears. The atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) rate remained nearly constant with SurePath, while the ASCUS/SIL ratio decreased by 68%. Unsatisfactory rates declined 81%. Histologic correlation rates with SurePath increased over those of conventional Pap smears. Pap test mean TATs improved 73% with SurePath.
CONCLUSION: Sure-Path detected significantly more cases of LSIL and HSIL than conventional smears without compromising specificity. The ASCUS/SIL ratio and unsatisfactory rate declined dramatically. Pap test TATs also improved markedly with SurePath.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14969176     DOI: 10.1159/000326278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  2 in total

1.  Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Fontaine; Nadira Narine; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates.

Authors:  Kirsten Rozemeijer; Corine Penning; Albert G Siebers; Steffie K Naber; Suzette M Matthijsse; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Folkert J van Kemenade; Inge M C M de Kok
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.