A Martin1, M Prenn, T Spiegel, C Sukopp, A von Strempel. 1. Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Innsbruck, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Orthopädie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Feldkirch, Austria. Arno.Martin@lkhf.at
Abstract
AIM: The benefits of postoperative wound drainage in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with regards to mobilisation and wound healing were studied. We wanted to determine the efficacy of an autologous blood retransfusion system. METHOD:150 patients with TKA were divided into three groups of 50 patients: A) three wound drainages with an autotransfusion system and suction; B) no wound drainage; C) one intraarticular wound drainage without suction. Hemoglobin values, blood transfusion requirements, blood loss, postoperative range of motion, Insall knee score and rate of complications were observed and recorded. All patients were operated without tourniquets for lower blood loss. RESULTS: In the group of patients with wound drainage and a retransfusion system the requirement of postoperative additional blood transfusion was not significantly less than in the group without wound drainage. Group A had the highest blood loss of all. The group without wound drainage had more hematomas and wound healing complications. Best results were observed within the group with one intraarticular drainage without suction. The rate of complications was not increased and the blood transfusion requirements were the lowest. CONCLUSION: This study shows that total knee replacement involving one intraarticular wound drainage without suction attains the best results.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The benefits of postoperative wound drainage in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with regards to mobilisation and wound healing were studied. We wanted to determine the efficacy of an autologous blood retransfusion system. METHOD: 150 patients with TKA were divided into three groups of 50 patients: A) three wound drainages with an autotransfusion system and suction; B) no wound drainage; C) one intraarticular wound drainage without suction. Hemoglobin values, blood transfusion requirements, blood loss, postoperative range of motion, Insall knee score and rate of complications were observed and recorded. All patients were operated without tourniquets for lower blood loss. RESULTS: In the group of patients with wound drainage and a retransfusion system the requirement of postoperative additional blood transfusion was not significantly less than in the group without wound drainage. Group A had the highest blood loss of all. The group without wound drainage had more hematomas and wound healing complications. Best results were observed within the group with one intraarticular drainage without suction. The rate of complications was not increased and the blood transfusion requirements were the lowest. CONCLUSION: This study shows that total knee replacement involving one intraarticular wound drainage without suction attains the best results.