Norman Kalant1, Ian Shrier. 1. Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B Davis--Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. nkalant@mtd.jgh.mcgill.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the relatively high degree of regionalization of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada, support is expressed for even further centralization of this procedure. The finding that the risk-adjusted mortality rate is lower at high volume hospitals is the basis for the decision to centralize. The goal of this study was to determine if current evidence supports the extension of such a policy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (1980 to 2002) provided mortality and surgical volume studies on 21 patient cohorts. For 16 of these, the published information permitted division of each cohort into those who had surgery at high or low volume hospitals. The target level for division was 200 cases per year; the level achieved was 200+/-44 (mean+/-SD). The odds ratio (OR) was calculated from the observed and expected mortality ratios. In seven studies, volume had been treated as a continuous variable; the effect of volume was expressed as OR per 100 patients in four of these studies. RESULTS: A plot of OR against year of surgery showed a progressive increase from 0.55 (favouring high volume) in 1972 to 0.95+/-0.07 for the past few years. All estimates of OR per 100 patients were very close to 1.0, also indicating little or no effect of volume on mortality. INTERPRETATION: These results are compatible with the concept that with time the lower mortality associated with high volume has been virtually eliminated. It is hypothesized that this development is explained by a multifaceted learning curve, improved surgical training and technical advances. Therefore, the current evidence does not provide a basis for further regionalization of cardiac bypass surgery.
BACKGROUND: Despite the relatively high degree of regionalization of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada, support is expressed for even further centralization of this procedure. The finding that the risk-adjusted mortality rate is lower at high volume hospitals is the basis for the decision to centralize. The goal of this study was to determine if current evidence supports the extension of such a policy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (1980 to 2002) provided mortality and surgical volume studies on 21 patient cohorts. For 16 of these, the published information permitted division of each cohort into those who had surgery at high or low volume hospitals. The target level for division was 200 cases per year; the level achieved was 200+/-44 (mean+/-SD). The odds ratio (OR) was calculated from the observed and expected mortality ratios. In seven studies, volume had been treated as a continuous variable; the effect of volume was expressed as OR per 100 patients in four of these studies. RESULTS: A plot of OR against year of surgery showed a progressive increase from 0.55 (favouring high volume) in 1972 to 0.95+/-0.07 for the past few years. All estimates of OR per 100 patients were very close to 1.0, also indicating little or no effect of volume on mortality. INTERPRETATION: These results are compatible with the concept that with time the lower mortality associated with high volume has been virtually eliminated. It is hypothesized that this development is explained by a multifaceted learning curve, improved surgical training and technical advances. Therefore, the current evidence does not provide a basis for further regionalization of cardiac bypass surgery.
Authors: James P Marcin; Zhongmin Li; Richard L Kravitz; Jian J Dai; David M Rocke; Patrick S Romano Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.402