Literature DB >> 14968107

Towards improved clinical and physiological assessments of recovery in spinal cord injury: a clinical initiative.

P H Ellaway1, P Anand, E M K Bergstrom, M Catley, N J Davey, H L Frankel, A Jamous, C Mathias, A Nicotra, G Savic, D Short, S Theodorou.   

Abstract

Clinical practice and scientific research may soon lead to treatments designed to repair spinal cord injury. Repair is likely to be partial in the first trials, extending only one or two segments below the original injury. Furthermore, treatments that are becoming available are likely to be applied to the thoracic spinal cord to minimise loss of function resulting from damage to surviving connections. These provisos have prompted research into the improvement of clinical and physiological tests designed (1) to determine the level and density of a spinal cord injury, (2) to provide reliable monitoring of recovery over one or two spinal cord segments, and (3) to provide indices of function provided by thoracic spinal root innervation, presently largely ignored in assessment of spinal cord injury. This article reviews progress of the Clinical Initiative, sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust, to advance the clinical and physiological tests of sensory, motor and autonomic function needed to achieve these aims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14968107     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  8 in total

1.  Electrical perceptual threshold testing: a validation study.

Authors:  Grace W S Leong; Catherine A Gorrie; Karl Ng; Sue Rutkowski; Phil M E Waite
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  Application of electrophysiological measures in spinal cord injury clinical trials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; John L K Kramer; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jan Rosner; Julio C Furlan; Keith E Tansey; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Reliability of TMS metrics in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K A Potter-Baker; D P Janini; F S Frost; P Chabra; N Varnerin; D A Cunningham; V Sankarasubramanian; E B Plow
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Changes in electrical perceptual threshold in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jenny Luise Lauschke; Grace W S Leong; Sue B Rutkowski; Phil M E Waite
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Cardiovascular responses to vibrostimulation for sperm retrieval in men with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Victoria Elizabeth Claydon; Stacy Lorraine Elliott; Andrew William Sheel; Andrei Krassioukov
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  How reliable are sympathetic skin responses in subjects with spinal cord injury?

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; Andrei V Krassioukov
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  Motor neurone excitability in back muscles assessed using mechanically evoked reflexes in spinal cord injured patients.

Authors:  A Kuppuswamy; S Theodorou; M Catley; P H Strutton; P H Ellaway; A H McGregor; N J Davey
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 8.  Vascular dysfunctions following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Constantin Popa; Florian Popa; Valentin Titus Grigorean; Gelu Onose; Aurelia Mihaela Sandu; Mihai Popescu; Gheorghe Burnei; Victor Strambu; Crina Sinescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.