Literature DB >> 14967426

Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary glioblastoma multiforme.

Nathan S Floyd1, Shiao Y Woo, Bin S Teh, Charlotte Prado, Wei-Yuan Mai, Todd Trask, Philip L Gildenberg, Paul Holoye, Mark E Augspurger, L Steven Carpenter, Hsin H Lu, J Kam Chiu, Walter H Grant, E Brian Butler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A pilot study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) in the adjuvant treatment of primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The rationale of the study was to combine the potential radiobiologic advantage of hypofractionation to GBM with a highly conformal radiotherapeutic technique. The study was designed to measure the acute and chronic morbidity of patients treated with this regimen, response of GBM to the treatment, overall survival, and time to disease progression after therapy completion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty eligible patients were accrued between February 1999 and May 2000 for the study. All patients had Karnofsky performance scores of >/=70. All patients were treated with intensity-modulated RT using the NOMOS Peacock system. A dose of 50 Gy was delivered in 5-Gy daily fractions within 2 weeks to enhancing primary disease, residual tumor, or surgical cavity. Simultaneously, 30 Gy was prescribed in 3-Gy daily fractions to surrounding edema. The time to progression was measured with serial neurologic examinations and MRI or CT scans after RT completion. Acute and late toxicity was graded using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group neurotoxicity scores.
RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 18 were evaluated for outcome. The median time to disease progression was 6 months after RT completion. The median overall survival was 7 months after treatment completion. All recurrences were within 2 cm of the operative bed. Neurotoxicity during therapy was minimal, with all patients experiencing Grade 0 or 1 toxicity. Late toxicity included 10 patients with Grade 0, 2 patients with Grade 2, and 3 patients with Grade 4 toxicity, manifesting as brain necrosis requiring surgical reexcision. The survival of the 3 patients with brain necrosis was 23, 20, and 9 months. Mortality in all cases was the result of tumor recurrence, with no mortality resulting from brain necrosis.
CONCLUSION: This regimen of hypofractionated intensity-modulated RT did not improve the time to disease progression or overall survival compared with historical experience using conventional fractionation. However, the treatment duration was reduced from 6 weeks to 2 weeks, which may be of palliative benefit in certain subsets of patients. This treatment regimen demonstrated a greater incidence of brain necrosis requiring surgical intervention; however, the 3 patients experiencing this toxicity had longer survival times. Future investigation may be useful to determine which fraction size may be optimal for GBM when highly conformal RT is used in the adjuvant setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14967426     DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01623-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  42 in total

1.  A pilot study of hypofractionated radiation therapy with temozolomide for adults with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Mizuhiko Terasaki; Tomoko Eto; Shinji Nakashima; Yosuke Okada; Etsuyo Ogo; Yasuo Sugita; Takashi Tokutomi; Minoru Shigemori
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  [Malignant gliomas--radiotherapy].

Authors:  Annemarie Schratter-Sehn
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-06

3.  Elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with concurrent temozolomide and standard- versus abbreviated-course radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christine N Chang-Halpenny; Jekwon Yeh; Winston W Lien
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015

4.  The results of hypofractionated radiotherapy in 31 patients with high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Meral Y Sayin; Bektas Kaya; Bekir H Bakkal; Kadri Altundag; Muzaffer B Altundag
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology.

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Alicia Tosoni; Federica Spagnolli; Giampiero Frezza; Marco Leonardi; Fabio Calbucci; Enrico Franceschi
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Remote brain microhaemorrhages may predict haematoma in glioma patients treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; Frédérique Charbonneau; Dimitri Psimaras; Marie-Astrid Metten; Antoine Gueguen; Khe Hoang Xuan; Loic Feuvret; Julien Savatovsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Radiation, chemotherapy, and symptom management in cancer-related cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Loiselle; Jason Rockhill
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-08

Review 8.  New advances that enable identification of glioblastoma recurrence.

Authors:  Isaac Yang; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  New Hypofractionation Radiation Strategies for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Melissa Azoulay; Jennifer Shah; Erqi Pollom; Scott G Soltys
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  CyberKnife enhanced conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for high grade glioma in close proximity to critical structures.

Authors:  Eric Oermann; Brian T Collins; Kelly T Erickson; Xia Yu; Sue Lei; Simeng Suy; Heather N Hanscom; Joy Kim; Hyeon U Park; Andrew Eldabh; Christopher Kalhorn; Kevin McGrail; Deepa Subramaniam; Walter C Jean; Sean P Collins
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 17.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.